Whistleblowing

Workers who make 'protected disclosures' (colloquially referred to as ‘whistleblowing’) are protected from dismissal, selection for redundancy and from being subjected to a detriment, such as the refusal of a pay increase or promotion or other forms of victimisation, under provisions inserted into the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA 1998), predominantly in ERA 1996, Pt IVA (sections 43A to 43L).

This legislation provides for a wide category of 'qualifying disclosures' relating to types of malpractice, and stipulates that to be a 'protected disclosure' the employee must make the disclosure in the accepted way. Whistleblowing complaints are dealt with by the employment tribunals. Whistleblowing represents an exception to an employee's normal duty of confidentiality.

Protected disclosure

Any whistleblowing claim must have as its foundation a 'protected disclosure'. This is:

  1. a disclosure of information

  2. which the worker reasonably believes is made in the public interest and tends to show

  3. one or more of certain types of wrongdoing including criminal offences, failing to comply with legal obligations, miscarriages of justice, endangerment of health or safety, damage

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

PAC criticises Home Office over failures to tackle exploitation under skilled worker visa route

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has found that the Home Office failed to adequately address the risk of exploitation and non-compliance under the skilled worker visa scheme, particularly in the care sector. In its 4 July 2025 report, the PAC criticises the department for failing to prevent abuse following the scheme’s 2022 expansion to support adult social care, highlighting serious weaknesses in safeguarding, compliance monitoring, and tracking of visa expiries. While the expansion helped alleviate workforce shortages during the pandemic, it also exposed migrant workers to exploitation, with evidence submitted to the inquiry detailing cases of debt bondage, excessive working hours and poor living conditions. Despite early signs of abuse, the Home Office was slow to respond and does not hold data on how many visa holders have been identified as potential victims of modern slavery. The PAC further found that the department lacks key data on visa compliance, including whether workers leave the UK at the end of their stay, are re-sponsored, or remain unlawfully, and has not analysed exit check data since the route’s introduction. In light of the recent decision to end overseas recruitment for care workers, the PAC warns of further risks unless cross-government workforce strategies are coordinated and calls for a joined-up approach to tackling exploitation and addressing domestic skills shortages.

View Employment by content type :

Popular documents