With reform of retained EU law high on the agenda, post-Brexit legal changes remains a key issue. Get key information and updates for all practitioners, with practice area specific Brexit content across the modules.
We outline the key principles and procedural requirements with a clear focus on the public sector perspective. The content focusses primarily on judicial review in the Administrative Court in England and Wales.
Failure to stick to procedures can have significant legal, financial and practical consequences for a contracting authority. We guide you through various processes, focussing on the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.
An essential resource providing guidance & materials on core legal subjects relevant to lawyers in all areas of legal practice, as well as specialist content designed to assist government lawyers in a range of key areas
The Ministry of Justice and Home Office have announced that enhanced parole provisions for national security offenders came into force on 22 March...
This week's edition of Public Law weekly highlights includes a hand-picked summary of news analysis, legal updates and case law from the world of...
The Cabinet Office has announced new public procurement guidance recognising shipbuilding, steel, artificial intelligence (AI) and energy...
The Metropolitan Police has revised its enforcement approach regarding displays of support for Palestine Action, a proscribed organisation under the...
The Cabinet Office has announced measures to revise Whitehall consultation and reporting approaches, working with the new Cabinet Secretary to address...
This new starter guide provides an introduction to trade mark law. It focuses on highlighting the basic principles that apply and includes numerous...
The below tracks live Court of Justice appeal cases involving State aid (Articles 107 to 109 TFEU) and other actions for the recovery of aid. For...
STOP PRESS: As of 24 February 2025, the main provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 (PA 2023) are in force. Procurements begun on or after this date...
This how-to guide provides a high-level summary of the procedural steps that a body exercising a public function should take in response to a...
This how-to guide provides a high-level summary of the procedural steps that a claimant should take to make an application for judicial review. The...
These training materials consist of template PowerPoint slides that can be used as the basis of one or more training seminars on defamation law. The...
STOP PRESS: On 19 June 2025, the Data (Use and Access) Bill received Royal Assent, becoming the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025) and coming...
These training materials consist of template PowerPoint slides that can be used as the basis of one or more training seminars on issues arising in...
The training materials are customisable.Click the links below to download the training presentation and speaker notes.Contents•What is the EU...
ARCHIVED: These archived training materials provide information on Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February...
Sources of constitutional lawIn briefThe British constitution is unwritten in the sense that it does not derive from a single constitutional text. It...
Methods of statutory interpretation used to resolve disputes about the meaning of legislationIntroduction to statutory interpretationThe aim of...
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human...
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to...
Grounds of judicial review—unreasonablenessThis Practice Note outlines the ground of judicial review usually known as unreasonableness or...
Separation of powers—legislative, executive and judiciarySource of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine of the...
Grounds of judicial review—illegalityOverview of the illegality groundIllegality is the first of the grounds on judicial review set out by Lord...
What is a public authority?There is no single, universal answer to the question whether a particular organisation is treated, in law, as a public...
Grounds of judicial review—procedural improprietyProcedural impropriety as a ground of judicial review‘Procedural impropriety’ is the last of the...
Judicial review—interested parties and intervenersInterested partiesIn the context of judicial review, an interested party is 'any person (other than...
Parliamentary supremacy—implied repealEssential to Parliament’s legislative supremacy is the principle that Parliament is not bound by its...
Grounds of judicial review—breach of legitimate expectationThe ground of challenge based on legitimate expectations is designed to hold a public...
Royal ChartersWhat is a Royal Charter?The term 'Royal Charter' has transformed over time. Originally, a Royal Charter was a procedure by which the...
Costs for judicial review—general principlesGeneral rule on costs in judicial reviewThe general rule in relation to costs in judicial review, as in...
Judicial review—what it is and when it can be usedWhat is judicial review?Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory...
Judicial deference and the margin of appreciationJudicial deference is also known as the principle that 'respect is a central concept in judicial...
Method of calculating the defined benefit liabilities of a pension scheme, which reflects the cost of buying out those liabilities through the purchase of matching annuities. SI 2005/678, reg 5(11) provides that the amount of the liabilities in respect of pensions and other benefits is to be calculated and verified by the actuary on the assumption that they will be discharged by the purchase of annuities of the kind described in section 74(3)(c) of the Pensions Act 1995 (discharge of liabilities; annuity purchase) and for this purpose the actuary must estimate the cost of purchasing annuities.
The contractor agrees to carry out the works at a capped price so that it is taking the risk of some of the events which would usually entitle it to claim further sums over and above the contract price. The term is misleading because there is almost no contract in which the contractor agrees to take all risks of increased costs including of course those which occur as a result of variations. Obviously, the price will include a substantial premium to cover the contractor against all of the risks that it is assuming.
One of the UK’s leading providers of governance'>corporate governance research which, since June 2014, has been part of the IA. It does not provide voting recommendations in relation to listed companies, instead it highlights issues or concerns for its subscribers to consider prior to voting through the unique colour coding, eg, a 'red top' indicates that there is an area of strong concern in relation to a company. Also known as IVIS.