With reform of retained EU law high on the agenda, post-Brexit legal changes remains a key issue. Get key information and updates for all practitioners, with practice area specific Brexit content across the modules.
We outline the key principles and procedural requirements with a clear focus on the public sector perspective. The content focusses primarily on judicial review in the Administrative Court in England and Wales.
Failure to stick to procedures can have significant legal, financial and practical consequences for a contracting authority. We guide you through various processes, focussing on the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.
An essential resource providing guidance & materials on core legal subjects relevant to lawyers in all areas of legal practice, as well as specialist content designed to assist government lawyers in a range of key areas
This week’s edition of Public Law weekly highlights includes a hand-picked summary of news analysis, legal updates and case law from the world of...
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on a draft Wales Procurement Policy Statement (WPPS) and draft integrated impact assessment. The WPPS...
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) has published its 16th report of session 2026–27. At its meeting on 3 November...
The Government Commercial Agency (GCA) and Government Commercial Function (GCF) have published the Procurement for Innovation Playbook to guide public...
The Home Office has published its consultation response on a proposed legal framework for law enforcement use of biometrics, facial recognition and...
This Practice Note considers the legal and human resources (HR) considerations for employers when dealing with staff who are transgender (trans) or...
The below tracks completed Court of Justice appeal cases involving State aid (Articles 107 to 109 TFEU) and other actions for the recovery of aid...
The below tracks completed national references to the Court of Justice concerning the interpretation of EU State aid law (Articles 107 to 109 TFEU)...
The below tracks live Court of Justice appeal cases involving State aid (Articles 107 to 109 TFEU) and other actions for the recovery of aid. For...
This new starter guide provides an introduction to database right law. It focuses on highlighting the basic principles that apply and includes...
This Agreement is made on [date]Parties1[insert name of party] [of [insert details ] OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number...
This Agreement is made on [date].Parties1[Insert name of party] [of [insert address] OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number...
This Agreement is made on [date]Parties1[Insert name of party][ of [insert details] OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number...
This Precedent is drafted in contemplation of arrangements where the parties wish to insert data processing provisions within a Schedule rather than...
This Precedent is drafted in contemplation of arrangements where the parties wish to insert data processing provisions within a Schedule rather than...
Sources of constitutional lawIn briefThe British constitution is unwritten in the sense that it does not derive from a single constitutional text. It...
Methods of statutory interpretation used to resolve disputes about the meaning of legislationIntroduction to statutory interpretationThe aim of...
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human...
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to...
Grounds of judicial review—unreasonablenessThis Practice Note outlines the ground of judicial review usually known as unreasonableness or...
Separation of powers—legislative, executive and judiciarySource of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine of the...
Grounds of judicial review—illegalityOverview of the illegality groundIllegality is the first of the grounds on judicial review set out by Lord...
What is a public authority?There is no single, universal answer to the question whether a particular organisation is treated, in law, as a public...
Grounds of judicial review—procedural improprietyProcedural impropriety as a ground of judicial review‘Procedural impropriety’ is the last of the...
Judicial review—interested parties and intervenersInterested partiesIn the context of judicial review, an interested party is 'any person (other than...
Parliamentary supremacy—implied repealEssential to Parliament’s legislative supremacy is the principle that Parliament is not bound by its...
Grounds of judicial review—breach of legitimate expectationThe ground of challenge based on legitimate expectations is designed to hold a public...
Royal ChartersWhat is a Royal Charter?The term 'Royal Charter' has transformed over time. Originally, a Royal Charter was a procedure by which the...
Costs for judicial review—general principlesGeneral rule on costs in judicial reviewThe general rule in relation to costs in judicial review, as in...
Judicial review—what it is and when it can be usedWhat is judicial review?Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory...
Judicial deference and the margin of appreciationJudicial deference is also known as the principle that 'respect is a central concept in judicial...
Fundamental right describes, in practice, a core legal entitlement that attracts heightened judicial protection and guides statutory interpretation and administrative decision‑making.
In England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, the term is descriptive rather than defined in statute. Courts speak of fundamental common‑law constitutional rights (such as access to the courts, liberty and freedom of expression) and of Convention rights under the Human Rights Act 1998. Such rights drive the principle of legality (clear words are needed to override them) and proportionality analysis. They shape judicial review and remedies: public authorities must act compatibly with Convention rights; incompatible primary legislation may prompt a declaration of incompatibility; devolved legislation is outside competence if ECHR‑incompatible.
In Ireland, fundamental rights is the label for constitutional rights in Articles 40–44 of the Constitution, elaborated by case law (including recognition of unenumerated personal rights). These bind the State, guide proportionality and can invalidate inconsistent legislation, with direct remedies.
Across both systems the European Convention on Human Rights is influential. Ireland also applies the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights when EU law is engaged; the Charter no longer forms part of UK domestic law post‑Brexit.
Practitioners invoke fundamental rights in pleadings, proportionality assessments and compliance.
Substantial evidence describes a level and quality of proof that is sufficiently credible, relevant and reliable to support a legal finding or decision. It is more than a mere scintilla or suspicion, but does not necessarily require proof beyond reasonable doubt or on the balance of probabilities; rather, it is evidence a reasonable decision‑maker could accept as adequate.
In UK and Irish practice, “substantial evidence” is most often encountered in judicial review, administrative and regulatory decision‑making, disciplinary proceedings and some employment and immigration contexts. Courts use it to assess whether a tribunal, public authority or regulator had a proper evidential basis for its conclusions and thus acted lawfully and rationally.
The expression is generally a case‑law concept rather than a precisely defined statutory test, and is interpreted in light of the overall standard of review being applied. Usage and meaning are broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, though the exact formulation and intensity of scrutiny will vary with the applicable statutory scheme, procedural rules and appellate or supervisory jurisdiction.
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) is the core international instrument that sets out how treaties are made, interpreted, applied, amended and terminated. It codifies customary international law on treaties and is routinely used by UK and Irish courts, governments and practitioners when dealing with public international law issues.
Key provisions include rules on treaty formation and consent to be bound; interpretation (Articles 31–33); reservations; invalidity (for example, error, fraud, corruption, coercion); and grounds for suspension or termination, including material breach and supervening impossibility. These rules underpin advice on treaty drafting, state responsibility and disputes before international courts and tribunals.
The UK and Ireland are parties to the VCLT and treat many of its rules as reflecting customary international law. While not directly incorporated as a whole into domestic legislation, its interpretative principles are regularly cited in case law across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Usage and legal effect are broadly consistent across these jurisdictions, particularly in foreign relations law, extradition, investment treaties, and human rights instruments such as the European Convention on Human Rights.