The following Public Law practice note Produced in partnership with Morayo Fagborun Bennett of Hardwicke Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The general rule in relation to costs in judicial review, as in other proceedings, is that costs follow the event. However, pre-emptive cost orders can be applied for.
The costs of, and incidental to, all proceedings in the High Court are at the discretion of the court. The High Court has, by statute, discretion to award costs on a judicial review application.
The court has discretion on whether to make a decision on costs which is different from the general rule taking into account all the circumstances including the overriding objective.
The extent of the court’s discretion is:
whether costs are payable by one party to another
the amount of those costs, and
when they are to be paid
Costs will follow the event unless in the circumstances of the case the court considers that some other order, in relation to costs, such as a pre-emptive costs order, should be made, for example for the claimant to continue the case.
An unsuccessful claimant will be ordered to pay the public body’s costs, including pre-permission costs.
The unsuccessful claimant will not usually be ordered to pay both the costs of the defendant and the interested parties, unless the interested party or parties deal with a separate point in the dispute from those dealt with by the defendant.
In Camden London Borough Council v Robert Gordon Humphreys
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the nature and scope of arbitration agreements with a particular focus on arbitration agreements pursuant to the law of England and Wales, although it also discusses the concept from an international perspective and includes some comparative examples from other
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
The principles of the notarial act are that it is:•an act of the notary and not of the parties named in the document•a record of a fact, event or transaction•in the form of a document, notwithstanding the form of the underlying document, fact, event or transactionThe purpose of the notarial act is
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.