Judicial review principles

Scope and application of judicial review

Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory jurisdiction over the exercise of public functions by public bodies. CPR 54.1 states that:

'a "claim for judicial review" means a claim to review the lawfulness of–
•
an enactment or
•
a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.’

Judicial review proceedings in England and Wales normally take place in the Administrative Court, which is part of the King’s Bench Division of the High Court. The Upper Tribunal also has a limited judicial review jurisdiction.

This subtopic focuses primarily on proceedings in the Administrative Court, providing a range of practical guidance materials on the relevant principles and procedures. It also contains guidance on the core principles, procedural steps and distinctive features of judicial review in the Upper Tribunal, as well as in Scotland.

Judicial review remedies are discretionary. The Administrative Court can make the following orders:

•
a quashing order (the effect of which the court has power to delay, and the retrospective effect of which the court has power to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

Public Law case law quarterly—Q2 2025

The Public Law case law quarterly provides details and analysis of notable judgments collated by the Lexis+® UK Public Law team each quarter. Highlights in this edition include analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, which confirmed that ‘sex’ under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) refers to biological sex. This edition also looks at Supreme Court decisions on the Special Immigration Appeals Commission’s role in national security appeals, anonymity and freedom of expression in the context of litigation involving NHS Trusts, and statutory interpretation and procedure in a case concerning rights of the public under the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985. Also in this edition, the European Court of Human Rights decision in Green v United Kingdom, which examined the margin of appreciation in the context of parliamentary privilege. Court of Appeal decisions highlighted in this edition concern recognition of non-binary gender under the Gender Recognition Act 2004, DOLs orders and Article 5 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR challenges to employment legislation, regulatory compliance in planning decisions, and amendments to the Public Order Act 1986. Further analysis considers legitimate expectation from oral statements, extensions of time in judicial review, recusal applications in cases of possible judicial bias, challenges to the removal of VAT exemptions for private school fees, applications to lift the automatic suspension in public procurement challenges, and the consequences of misusing AI in court proceedings.

SLSC publishes 30th report of session 2024–2025

The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) has published its 30th Report of Session 2024–2025, drawing attention to the Draft Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025, which proposes the proscription of three groups—Palestine Action, Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement—under counter-terrorism legislation, and the Water Supply and Sewerage Services (Customer Service Standards) (Amendment) Regulations 2025, which update the Guaranteed Standards Scheme for the first time in 25 years but include an indexation mechanism that may not function as intended. The report also highlights instruments of interest including the Draft Warm Home Discount (Amendment) Regulations 2025, which expand eligibility and funding for energy bill support; the Draft Oliver McGowan Code of Practice on statutory learning disability and autism training, which sets standards for mandatory training in health and social care; and the Allocation of Housing (Qualification Criteria for Victims of Domestic Abuse and Care Leavers) (England) Regulations 2025, SI 2025/706, which standardise exemptions from local connection requirements across England.

Public Law weekly highlights—3 July 2025

This week's edition of Public Law weekly highlights includes: the new consultation on further public procurement reforms building on the Procurement Act 2023, alongside an article from the Crown Commercial Service on consortium bidding, publication of the government’s National Security Strategy 2025, plus Home Office guidance on the newly-launched Foreign Influence Registration Scheme. Also in this edition, a joint statement from HM Treasury and the European Commission on the financial settlement obligations under the Withdrawal Agreement, an updated response from Defra on the Arbitration Tribunal’s final ruling in the UK-Sandeel case, plus updates on the UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago and Diego Garcia. Case updates this week include the High Court’s ruling ordering a further investigation into the provision of false evidence by MI5, plus a number of judicial review and freedom of information cases. This edition features further updates on Brexit highlights, Brexit SIs, Post-Brexit guidance, constitutional and administrative law, public procurement, judicial review, information law, State security and intelligence, State accountability and liability, subsidy control and State aid.