Judicial review principles

Scope and application of judicial review

Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory jurisdiction over the exercise of public functions by public bodies. CPR 54.1 states that:

'a "claim for judicial review" means a claim to review the lawfulness of–
•
an enactment or
•
a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.’

Judicial review proceedings in England and Wales normally take place in the Administrative Court, which is part of the King’s Bench Division of the High Court. The Upper Tribunal also has a limited judicial review jurisdiction.

This subtopic focuses primarily on proceedings in the Administrative Court, providing a range of practical guidance materials on the relevant principles and procedures. It also contains guidance on the core principles, procedural steps and distinctive features of judicial review in the Upper Tribunal, as well as in Scotland.

Judicial review remedies are discretionary. The Administrative Court can make the following orders:

•
a quashing order (the effect of which the court has power to delay, and the retrospective effect of which the court has power to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

Commons Library publishes briefing on the UK voting age

The House of Commons Library has published a briefing on the voting age, following the announcement of plans to reduce the voting age to 16 for all elections in the UK. This briefing details the current voting age for UK elections and considers the debate about lowering the voting age.

SLSC publishes 33rd report of session 2024–25

The Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) has published its 33rd Report of 2024–25, drawing special attention to Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (HC 997). The statement includes two key sets of measures. The first makes significant changes to the skilled worker visa route, tightening the conditions for granting such visas and removing the social care sector from the list of occupations eligible to recruit migrant workers. Several aspects of this new system remain unclear, pending a consultation that has yet to be launched. The second closes new applications to the two statutory schemes that supported Afghans who assisted UK operations and objectives in Afghanistan, including through resettlement in the UK. The statement is drawn to the special attention of the House due to insufficient explanatory material to clearly understand its policy objective or intended implementation.

UN Committee finds UK breached Aarhus Convention over lack of public consultation on Brexit legislation

The UN Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee has published draft findings concluding that the UK breached Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention during the development of the EU Withdrawal Bill. The Committee found that the UK failed to: (1) implement required public consultation timeframes; (2) make the draft Bill available for public scrutiny; and (3) provide opportunities for public feedback. The findings, which follow a 2017 complaint by Friends of the Earth, will become legally binding under international law if adopted by the Convention’s member states in November 2025. If adopted, the UK will be required to implement legislative changes to ensure effective public consultation on future environmental laws. The UK government may choose to implement the findings ahead of the November 2025 meeting.

JCHR announces call for evidence in scrutiny of Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2025

The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) has announced that it will scrutinise the draft Human Rights Act 1998 (Remedial) Order 2025. This follows the European Court of Human Rights’ judgment in SW v United Kingdom, which found that section 9(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 is incompatible with Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as it prevents individuals from claiming damages for judicial acts done in good faith which breach their rights under Article 8 ECHR. The JCHR is mandated under Standing Orders to examine proposed remedial orders and report its findings to Parliament within 60 sitting days. As part of it inquiry, the JCHR invites written submissions by 26 September 2025.