Make use of our costs recovery toolkit, precedents practice notes, and completing costs budget checklist. As well as funding arrangements guidance, principles of costs recovery, costs budgeting and management.
Choose from checklists, practice notes, flowcharts and precedents to help you understand and apply to your practice to all relevant provisions and obligations – and avoid consequences for non-compliance.
Checklists and practice notes on areas like debt claims, corporate disputes, and civil fraud to make sure you’re familiar with the particular procedural provisions governing a dispute and the underlying substantive law.
Trying to get to grips with the law underlying your dispute? Looking at trying to settle? Puzzled by costs and funding reforms? Out of your depth on jurisdiction issues?
This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions,...
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published a Court Forms Destination Table setting out changes to Chancery Division forms to support the...
The Law Commission has launched a consultation proposing reforms to the product liability regime under Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 in...
Dispute Resolution analysis: In Amaal Ventures Ltd and Shievon Ventures Ltd v Eros Ltd, the High Court considered the costs consequences where the...
Commercial analysis: The Court of Appeal held that an indemnity introduced into an existing PPI agency relationship did not extend retrospectively to...
This Practice Note sets out the deadline/time limit for filing and serving statements of case in cross-border Part 7 claims. It covers the time for...
This Practice Note sets out what proprietary estoppel is, how to establish a plea of proprietary estoppel and provides examples of when in practice...
It is not just clients who may be able to bring a claim in negligence against their professional advisers. This Practice Note considers who can be...
The general principles applicable in contractual dispute cases pertaining to formation, interpretation and remedies for breach are relatively well...
This Practice Note considers how to pursue a breach of warranty claim in the context of warranties provided in a share sale and purchase agreement...
Claim No. [insert claim number].[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE[[BUSINESS AND PROPERTY DIVISION OR KING’S BENCH DIVISION][Insert court, list or sub-list...
Filed on behalf of the ClaimantWitness statement of [initial and surname of witness]Number: [number of witness statement in relation to the witness eg...
Claim No. [insert claim number].[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE][[BUSINESS AND PROPERTY DIVISION OR KING’S BENCH DIVISION]OR[Insert court, list or...
Claim No. [insert claim number].[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE[[BUSINESS AND PROPERTY DIVISION OR KING’S BENCH DIVISION][Insert court, list or sub-list...
Filed on behalf of the claimantWitness Statement of [insert initial and surname of witness ]Number of witness statement: [insert number of witness...
What is a tort?This Practice Note provides an introduction to tort law by addressing three questions:•what does the concept of being liable in tort...
Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimThis Practice Note outlines the key elements for establishing a claim in negligence. For...
Rescission of a contractWhat is rescission of a contract?The remedy of rescission is available to a party whose consent, in entering into a contract,...
The doctrine of res judicataWhat is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of...
Reserved judgmentsWhat is a reserved judgment?A court can reserve judgment by giving its decision at a later date in writing, after the trial or...
Novation—why and how to novate a contractThere may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original...
Void contractsWhen is a contract a void contract?A void contract is one that is wholly lacking in legal effect. A contract will be void where:•the...
Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?This Practice Note considers the first question to ask when faced with a prospective claim in...
Declaratory reliefThis Practice Note considers when, why and how you can apply to court for declaratory relief (a declaration from the court) and what...
Tort—the different types of tortThis Practice Note identifies the main torts (bar negligence and nuisance, which are covered elsewhere in our related...
The application notice—form N244This Practice Note provides guidance on completing the most common form of application notice, form N244.This Practice...
Court etiquetteThe most important rule is to be polite. If you are polite to everyone at all times, it is hard to go seriously wrong.The judgeMake...
Stay of proceedings—when can you apply to stay a claim?This Practice Note considers the question of when court proceedings can be stayed. It...
Promissory estoppelFor guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see...
Grounds of appeal—appealing a finding of factWhen will the court allow an appeal against a finding of fact?The appeal court will only allow an appeal...
Restitution for unjust enrichment—elements of the claimWhat is unjust enrichment and when is it used?A claim based on unjust enrichment is one which...
Interest on judgment debtsThis Practice Note provides guidance on claiming interest on judgment debts.For information on claiming interest when...
Misrepresentation—what statements will establish a claim?This Practice Note considers the requirement for there to be a false statement of fact for an...
An agreed statement of facts is a document jointly prepared by the parties that records the material facts not in dispute for a hearing, trial, sentencing or appeal. It streamlines case management by narrowing the issues, avoiding unnecessary evidence, reducing costs and time, and assisting the judge or tribunal.
The term is a descriptive practice expression rather than a defined statutory term. In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, agreed facts operate as admissions: once filed or stated on the record, they generally require no proof and cannot be withdrawn without the court’s permission (consistent with the regimes on formal admissions in criminal and civil procedure, including Criminal Justice Act 1967, Criminal Procedure Rules and notices to admit). In Scotland, the functional equivalent is a joint minute of admissions in both civil and criminal proceedings, which, when lodged, binds the parties as to the admitted facts. In Ireland, Superior Courts practice (notably in the Commercial List) often directs a statement of agreed facts and issues; agreed facts are treated as admissions and stand in place of evidence.
Typical features include concise, numbered factual propositions, confined to facts (not law or argument), signed by legal representatives and filed or lodged for inclusion in the trial bundle or hearing papers. Usage is broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland.
A copy of an electronic document.
Multiplicity of actions describes a situation where substantially the same dispute is pursued through two or more sets of legal proceedings, often in different courts or between overlapping parties. It commonly arises where parallel claims, duplicative proceedings or fragmented litigation risk inconsistent judgments, wasted costs and inefficient use of court resources.
In the UK and Ireland, “multiplicity of actions” is generally a descriptive expression rather than a defined statutory term. It appears frequently in case law and procedural argument, particularly in applications for case management stays, striking out, abuse of process, forum non conveniens and anti‑suit injunctions.
Courts in England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland share a common objective of avoiding multiplicity of actions. Judges may respond by: staying one set of proceedings; ordering consolidation or transfer; striking out as an abuse of process; or giving directions to coordinate related cases.
In cross‑border and commercial litigation, addressing multiplicity of actions is crucial to risk management, controlling litigation costs and reducing the danger of conflicting decisions, especially where parallel proceedings are on foot in another UK jurisdiction, Ireland, or overseas courts.