Judicial review process

Scope and application of judicial review

Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory jurisdiction over the exercise of public functions by public bodies. CPR 54.1 states that:

'a "claim for judicial review" means a claim to review the lawfulness of–
•
an enactment or
•
a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.’

Judicial review proceedings in England and Wales normally take place in the Administrative Court, which is part of the King’s Bench Division of the High Court. The Upper Tribunal also has a limited judicial review jurisdiction.

This subtopic focuses primarily on proceedings in the Administrative Court, providing a range of practical guidance materials on the relevant principles and procedures. It also contains guidance on the core principles, procedural steps and distinctive features of judicial review in the Upper Tribunal, as well as in Scotland.

Judicial review remedies are discretionary. The Administrative Court can make the following orders:

•
a quashing order (the effect of which the court has power to delay, and the retrospective effect of which the court has power to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

Government publishes communiqué for Inter-Ministerial Group for Housing, Communities and Local Government meeting on 4 June 2025

The government has published a communiqué from an in-person meeting of the Inter-Ministerial Group for Housing, Communities and Local Government held on 4 June 2025 in Cardiff. Subjects covered include the UK government's response to the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report, including plans for a single regulator and Chief Construction Advisor. Ministers also discussed workforce issues concerning the capacity, competence and resilience of key professions in the building control and fire safety sectors, as well as construction product reform and regulation. The date of the next meeting is yet to be confirmed.

Home Office updates EU-UK judicial cooperation notifications under TCA

The Home Office has published updated documentation regarding notifications made under Part Three of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) between the UK and EU concerning law enforcement and judicial cooperation. The update includes revised notifications from the European Union to the UK, contained within a 142-page document. The notifications system supports the implementation and operation of cross-border law enforcement and judicial cooperation arrangements established under the TCA.

Cabinet Office updates guide to making legislation

The Cabinet Office has published an update to its guide to making legislation, which sets out the procedures for preparing primary legislation and taking it through Parliament. A new version of the guide was published in February 2025. In the update, section 10.4 (on the legal status of explanatory notes) has been revised.

Public Law case law quarterly—Q2 2025

The Public Law case law quarterly provides details and analysis of notable judgments collated by the Lexis+® UK Public Law team each quarter. Highlights in this edition include analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, which confirmed that ‘sex’ under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) refers to biological sex. This edition also looks at Supreme Court decisions on the Special Immigration Appeals Commission’s role in national security appeals, anonymity and freedom of expression in the context of litigation involving NHS Trusts, and statutory interpretation and procedure in a case concerning rights of the public under the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985. Also in this edition, the European Court of Human Rights decision in Green v United Kingdom, which examined the margin of appreciation in the context of parliamentary privilege. Court of Appeal decisions highlighted in this edition concern recognition of non-binary gender under the Gender Recognition Act 2004, DOLs orders and Article 5 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR challenges to employment legislation, regulatory compliance in planning decisions, and amendments to the Public Order Act 1986. Further analysis considers legitimate expectation from oral statements, extensions of time in judicial review, recusal applications in cases of possible judicial bias, challenges to the removal of VAT exemptions for private school fees, applications to lift the automatic suspension in public procurement challenges, and the consequences of misusing AI in court proceedings.