The following Dispute Resolution guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers the Closed Material Procedure (CMP) which allows the state to disclose sensitive material to the judge without having to disclose the material to its opponent.
For many years, the State has been able to safeguard matters of national security and other associated matters by seeking to withhold disclosure of documents on the basis of an assertion of public interest immunity (PII)—see Practice Note: Public interest immunity.
If the PII application was successful, the advantage for the State was the protection of sensitive information as the documents would not be disclosed to anyone and would not feature in, or have any bearing on, the matters being litigated. However, the downside for the State was that where those documents assisted its position, the State itself could not make use of them, their having been excluded under the PII certificate.
If however the PII application failed, then the documents were disclosable to all parties in the litigation. Thus, if the PII application failed, the State had the choice to:
'disclose and be damned' as regards any consequences for State matters as a result of the disclosure, or
abandon its case to preserve the secrecy and integrity of such sensitive information
With the increase in the number of damages claims being brought against the State,
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234