The following Public Law practice note Produced in partnership with Mathew Purchase of Matrix Chambers and Dr Mirza Ahmad of St Philips Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory jurisdiction over the exercise of public functions by public bodies. This supervisory jurisdiction should not be confused with or considered to be a right of appeal.
CPR 54.1 states that:
a 'claim for judicial review' means a claim to review the lawfulness of–•an enactment or•a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.’
a 'claim for judicial review' means a claim to review the lawfulness of–
an enactment or
a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.’
Proceedings normally take place in the Administrative Court, which is part of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court. Judicial review proceedings are subject to a number of Civil Procedure Rules, Practice Directions and a pre-action protocol. Additional guidance is also provided in the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide. The guide is designed to assist parties conducting judicial review claims in the Administrative Court, collating relevant statutory provisions, procedural rules, practice directions, case law and guidance. The guide aims to ensure efficient use of court resources and to help achieve the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost.
The key rules governing the judicial review process are set out in section 31 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981) and CPR 54, which modifies CPR 8. However, other provisions of the CPR, such as those concerning costs, may also be applicable. SCA 1981, s
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
This Practice Note provides a high-level introduction to diversity and inclusion (D&I) and key reasons why it is important to law firms. Specific aspects of D&I are covered in more detail in Practice Notes:•The growing focus on diversity and inclusion (D&I) in law firms•Unconscious bias—law
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.