Hybrid working

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This subtopic contains materials and commentary on, and analysis of, the employment issues that may arise in relation to hybrid working, sometimes known as agile working, where staff attend the workplace for part of their working time and work from home or elsewhere remotely for part of their working time. Hybrid working can be distinguished from pure homeworking, where the worker works entirely from home, although some employers have had partial homeworking arrangements in place for some time.

The concept of hybrid working emerged from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, during which many employees have been working entirely, or primarily, from home, and it is envisaged that employees will continue to work for part of the time at home, while returning to their workplaces for the remainder.

Hybrid working

Practice Note: Hybrid working examines the legal and practical issues for an employer to consider in relation to hybrid working. The Practice Note considers:

  1. •

    the background to the emergence of hybrid working as a concept

  2. •

    issues for the employer to consider when deciding its hybrid working strategy, and

  3. •

    practical steps for the employer to take to implement hybrid working

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Home Office announces operational partnership with delivery giants to combat illegal working

The Home Office has announced a new operational partnership with Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats to help tackle illegal working in the UK’s delivery sector. The agreement is reported to support enforcement efforts by enabling delivery firms to receive information, including the locations of asylum hotels, to help identify misuse. It also introduces enhanced security measures—such as facial verification checks and fraud detection tools—to ensure only verified users can access the platforms. The initiative forms part of the government’s Plan for Change, which aims to disrupt organised immigration crime and reduce the exploitation of vulnerable migrants by smuggling gangs. Legislative support is provided through the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025, which requires all employers to verify the legal working status of individuals.

Digital distraction and addictions in the workplace

Employment analysis: With smartphones and digital platforms embedded in our day to day lives, more employees are struggling with behavioural addictions. Jen Kingsmill & Charlotte Morgan of Lewis Silkin explore the legal and practical challenges for employers.

Employment weekly highlights—24 July 2025

This edition of Employment weekly highlights includes: (1) an Employment Rights Bill clause amendment voted in favour of by the House of Lords at the Bill’s Report Stage, creating a duty on certain employers to take reasonable steps to investigate any whistleblowing disclosure made to them, (2) a call for evidence on unpaid internships and similar work practices, (3) updated Sponsor Guidance from the Home Office, (4) draft legislation due to come into force in April 2026 to make recruitment agencies jointly and severally liable for PAYE when they supply workers via umbrella companies, (5) analysis by Jen Kingsmill and Charlotte Morgan of Lewis Silkin of the legal and practical challenges for employers of behavioural additions related to the use of smartphones and digital technology generally, (6) a judgment from the Court of Appeal upholding a race discrimination claim against Leicester County Council, (7) the announcement of a planned upgrade closure on 31 July of Employment Tribunals online services, (8) publication by the Lexis+® UK Ireland (Employment) team of a new precedent compromise agreement, together with an accompanying letter to an employee enclosing the draft compromise agreement, and a new subtopic on the European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 (TUPE), (9) dates for your diary, and (10) other news items of interest to employment practitioners.

Police officer launches legal challenge against union ban

Law360: A police officer is taking the Home Secretary to court over a century-old law that bans officers from unionising, arguing the restriction violates human rights and leaves officers with no credible form of independent representation, lawyers at Leigh Day confirmed on 21 July 2025.

View Employment by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an
What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an