Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this judgment?
- Jurisdiction for trying the offence as between England, Wales, or Scotland
- What are the essential ingredients of the offence
- What state of mind is required for a conviction for the offence
- Whether an administrator may be liable for the criminal offence
- What is the relevant background?
- Background law
- Background facts and decisions of the Magistrates’ Court
- What did the Divisional Court decide?
- The jurisdiction question (Mr Forsey’s application)
More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Article summary
Employment analysis: The Divisional Court has given guidance on various aspects of the criminal offence under ss 193–194 of TULR(C)A 1992 for failure to notify the Secretary of State of proposed redundancies. The guidance touches on (i) jurisdiction as between England, Wales and Scotland for holding the trial, (ii) the actus reus and mens rea necessary for the offence to have been committed, and (iii) the personal liability for the offence of administrators.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial