Working time and flexible working

The Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR 1998), SI 1998/1833 provide basic minimum rights to work a reasonable number of hours and have reasonable rest breaks and holidays. They also include special protections for night workers and young workers who are considered to be at particular risk. However, a large number of people are either wholly or partially excluded.

Eligibility for working time rights

The provisions setting out who is covered by WTR 1998 are complicated. Some whole job sectors are totally excluded. Other sectors are partially excluded.

Even if a worker's job type is covered by WTR 1998, their specific job may be subject to one of the 'special case' exemptions, or be one which is not entitled to the full protection of the regulations because they control their own hours, work unusual shifts or because they are covered by an opt-out under a collective agreement.

For further information, see Practice Note: Eligibility for working time rights.

Hours of work and working time

Workers and employers are free to agree any hours of work they choose up to the maximum working hours set out

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Employment News

No timetable for Labour’s Equality (Race and Disability) Bill

Law360: The Minister for Equalities has declined to say when promised legislation to introduce ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting will be put forward.

Employment weekly highlights—29 January 2026

This edition of Employment weekly highlights includes: (1) an Employment Appeal Tribunal decision on the effect of a pre-existing contractual variation provision on indirect race discrimination claims following a TUPE transfer, (2) a Court of Appeal decision confirming that public sector commissioning and purchasing does not constitute ‘economic activity’ for the purposes of TUPE 2006, (3) an EAT decision on Polkey reductions and predicting an employer’s actions, (4) an EAT decision on whether personal injury claims arising from employment are subject to state immunity, (5) a Court of Appeal decision on the types of errors and omissions which warrant an extension of time, (6) an updated Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA 2025) tracker detailing progress and upcoming implementation for ERA 2025, (7) dates for your diary and (8) other news and resources of interest to employment practitioners.

EHRC signs MoU with National Fire Chiefs Council to address discrimination

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) to address discrimination and promote inclusion across fire and rescue services. The agreement forms part of the EHRC's uniformed services programme, which seeks to address race and sex-based discrimination, harassment and victimisation within the fire, police and armed forces. Under the MoU, the EHRC will deliver a bespoke support package in 2026, including a webinar series on preventing sexual harassment, a peer-to-peer learning programme and sector-specific case studies. The EHRC will also contribute to the NFCC's Listen and Learn sessions and provide feedback on key products such as the Culture Dashboard Methodology. In turn, the NFCC will circulate EHRC surveys and event invitations through its networks and nominate representatives to support the development of EHRC guidance for the sector.

National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: HoC backs pension salary sacrifice reform despite opposition

The House of Commons (HoC) completed the Committee of the Whole House and Third Reading Stages of the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill on 21 January 2026, assisting the progress of the introduction from 6 April 2029 of a £2,000 cap above which salary-sacrificed employer pension contributions will have a primary and secondary Class 1 National Insurance contributions (NICs) charge applied. At Committee stage, opposition parties sought to narrow or delay the measure and to require further scrutiny, but the government, represented throughout by Torsten Bell, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury and Minister for Pensions, resisted all proposed changes and the Bill emerged unamended. On the same day at Third Reading, Torsten Bell said reform was inevitable because of the rising cost of pension salary sacrifice and defended the Bill as a pragmatic compromise that retained £2,000 of NIC-free saving with a long lead-in period. Despite opposition MPs opposing the Bill on the grounds of complexity, distributional impact, and pension adequacy, the Commons passed the Bill unamended by 316 votes to 194 and it now proceeds to the House of Lords.