The following Financial Services practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The regulation of carrying on insurance business in the UK dates back to 1870 with the enactment of the Life Assurance Companies Act 1870 (which contained a requirement for any company engaged in life assurance business to make a deposit in court by way of security). A number of enhancements were made by successive pieces of legislation.
The original UK system of regulation was rendered somewhat obsolete by the implementation of various pieces of EU legislation dating back to the early 1970s: there followed a directive governing life assurance. These directives have been enhanced by the ‘second non-life insurance directive’ (Directive 88/357/EEC) and the ‘second life insurance directive’ (Directive 90/619/EEC), which were soon superseded by the ‘third non-life directive’ (Directive 92/49/EEC) and ‘third life directive’ (Directive 92/96/EEC).
the First Non-Life Insurance Directive (Directive 73/239/EEC) brought in a European Economic Community (EEC) system of solvency margins, as well as a procedure for insurers to follow if they fail to meet such requirements
the First Life Insurance Directive (Directive 79/267/EEC), which contained similar provisions to the first non-life insurance directive
the Second Non-Life Insurance Directive (Directive 88/357/EEC) which enhanced the first non-life insurance directive
the Second Life Insurance Directive (Directive 90/619/EEC) which enhanced the first life insurance directive
the Third Non-Life Insurance Directive (Directive
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
This Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.Note: this Practice Note does not deal with the
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.