Types of personal pension scheme

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Personal pensions have been a great success story in UK pensions since they first became available on 1 July 1988. Despite an almost constant barrage of news stories warning that few individuals are saving enough for retirement, there can be no denying that several million individuals have chosen to do so through a personal pension.

Remarkably, the expression is no longer defined in HMRC legislation or practice, and for the purposes of this overview, the expression 'personal pension' means a registered pension scheme which is not an occupational pension scheme (as defined in the Finance Act 2004, s 150) or an annuity policy providing benefits previously accrued under an occupational pension scheme.

Personal pensions are generally provided through one of the following arrangements:

  1. •

    individual personal pensions (insurance-based or other unitised investment-based)

  2. •

    group personal pensions (GPPs)

  3. •

    stakeholder pension schemes

  4. •

    self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs), or

  5. •

    legacy arrangements (such as retirement annuity contracts and free-standing AVC schemes)

Personal pensions—an introduction

Personal pensions are often described as contract-based pension schemes and contrasted with occupational pension schemes, which are typically either statute or trust-based.

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Financial Services News

PRA publishes letter on solvency-triggered termination rights in BPA transactions

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a 'Dear Chief Risk Officer' letter by its executive director of insurance supervision, Gareth Truran, to share its view of the potential risks arising from the use of solvency-triggered termination rights clauses (STTRs) in bulk purchase annuity (BPA) transactions and its assessment of how firms are mitigating those risks. The letter follows a thematic review of STTRs, which allow pension scheme counterparties to terminate BPA buy-in arrangements if an insurer’s solvency position falls below a defined threshold. The PRA notes that while these clauses are becoming more common, they may introduce financial and operational risks, particularly in stressed conditions, and could affect firms’ liquidity, asset composition and matching adjustment (MA) portfolios.

FCA announces two individuals sentenced for £1.5m crypto fraud

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced that Raymondip Bedi and Patrick Mavanga have been sentenced to a combined 12 years’ imprisonment for their roles in a £1.5m crypto fraud. Between February 2017 and June 2019, the individuals cold-called victims and sold fake investments in crypto consultancy services. At least 65 investors were defrauded, with total losses amounting to £1,541,799. Bedi was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court to five years and four months’ imprisonment, and Mavanga received a sentence of six years and six months. Both had previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to breach the general prohibition under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Bedi also admitted to money laundering offences, while Mavanga was additionally convicted of perverting the course of justice. Confiscation proceedings are continuing. The FCA says that it has attempted to contact investors who lost out and has asked any who have not yet been contacted to come forward.

European Commission adopts Delegated Act regarding the use of alternative internal models under the CRR

The European Commission has adopted a Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)) with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions for assessing the materiality of extensions of, and changes to, the use of alternative internal models, and changes to the subset of the modellable risk factors. The Delegated Regulation enters into force on the 20th day of its publication in the OJ.

FCA announces two individuals sentenced for £1.5m crypto fraud

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced that Raymondip Bedi and Patrick Mavanga have been sentenced to a combined 12 years’ imprisonment for their roles in a £1.5m crypto fraud. Between February 2017 and June 2019, the individuals cold-called victims and sold fake investments in crypto consultancy services. At least 65 investors were defrauded, with total losses amounting to £1,541,799. Bedi was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court to five years and four months’ imprisonment, and Mavanga received a sentence of six years and six months. Both had previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to breach the general prohibition under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Bedi also admitted to money laundering offences, while Mavanga was additionally convicted of perverting the course of justice. Confiscation proceedings are continuing. The FCA says that it has attempted to contact investors who lost out and has asked any who have not yet been contacted to come forward.

View Financial Services by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal terms

Glossary—Latin legal termsDespite attempts in recent years to simplify the language used in legal cases, there are still a number of Latin phrases commonly used in personal injury claims. The following Latin phrases are listed in alphabetical order:Latin

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of