Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc)

The Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) provides protection against discrimination and other prohibited conduct relating to protected characteristics which people may possess. Some protections relate specifically to only one of those characteristics.

This topic provides information on the conduct that is prohibited under EqA 2010. EqA 2010 divides the types of prohibited conduct into the following categories:

  1. discrimination, which includes:

    1. direct discrimination

    2. indirect discrimination

    3. discrimination arising from disability

    4. failure to make reasonable adjustments for a disabled person

    5. pregnancy and maternity discrimination

    6. gender reassignment discrimination: cases of absence from work

  2. other prohibited conduct, which includes:

    1. harassment

    2. victimisation

Direct discrimination

A person directly discriminates against another person where:

  1. they treat them less favourably than they treat or would treat others, and

  2. they do so because of a protected characteristic

Direct age discrimination can be justified if the respondent can show that the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) amounting to discrimination was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Other forms of direct

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Detailed list of Home Office’s Sponsor Guidance changes of 6 March 2026

Immigration analysis: On 6 March 2026, the Home Office issued new versions of each of the three principal Worker and Temporary Worker Sponsor Guidance documents, as well as of other Sponsor Guidance documents including Appendix D (on retaining documents) and the Sponsor a Skilled Worker guidance. We have set out below a detailed list of all of the substantive changes, as well as other wording changes which the Home Office appears to have made to focus sponsors’ minds on recent operational concerns, in light of the current significant increase in compliance checks and enforcement (eg around salary underpayment). One important change is the replacement of the ‘genuine vacancy’ concept with the newly defined term ‘eligible role’, now contained in a new standalone glossary document. The new four-limbed definition embeds skill, salary and route requirements, compliance with wider employment law, and proportionality to the sponsor’s business model into a continuing test that must be met throughout sponsorship. Other operational-related changes include around illegal working requirements, and reinforcing the importance of Certificate of Sponsorship details matching the work actually undertaken (or reporting permitted changes). The wording around the standard of proof for the enforcement threshold in some cases has also been amended to ‘reasonable suspicion’, presumably as an attempt to expand the Home Office’s discretion to refuse, suspend or revoke licences. Other suitability/compliance amendments relate to concerns about dishonesty, salary inflation or risks to the integrity of the sponsorship system. At the same time, the guidance emphasises that participation in the sponsorship scheme (now formally termed a ‘scheme’) is voluntary and that a licence is granted and held at the Home Office’s discretion. There is also an increased focus on worker welfare and compliance with wider UK law, including a new requirement to inform sponsored workers of their employment rights and retain evidence of having done so. It had been anticipated that further guidance would be included on when and how employers are permitted to ‘claw back’ some immigration costs in circumstances where a sponsored worker leaves their employment early, but there were no more changes made on this aspect in the new guidance.

View Employment by content type :

Popular documents