Table of contents
- What are the practical implications?
- Conclusion
- What is the relevant background?
- Background law
- Background facts
- What did the EAT decide?
- DWP v Boyers
- Iceland Foods v Stevenson
- Case details
- DWP v Boyers
More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Article summary
Employment analysis: The question of whether the s 98(4) ERA 1996 unfair dismissal test to determine if a dismissal was reasonable is the same as, or different from, the test for whether that dismissal was proportionate (and hence justified) for the purposes of a s 15 EqA 2010 claim for discrimination arising from a disability is considered in two cases by the EAT: DWP v Boyers and Iceland Foods v Stevenson.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial