Union status and obligations

Both workers and employers may form groupings that could generally be described as ‘unions’. In the case of employers these are usually called employers’ associations. Workers also form groupings for the support and advancement of their members’ interests, which are usually called trade unions.

The law relating to trade unions is largely governed by extensive statutory provisions, such as those found in the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, give a broad definition of ‘trade union’, set out trade unions’ status and capacity, and impose various statutory obligations on them.

Union status and capacity

A trade union is defined as an organisation, whether temporary or permanent:

•
which either fulfils two conditions:
1. ◦
  it consists wholly or mainly of workers of one or more descriptions
2. ◦
  its principal purposes include the regulation of relations between workers of that description or those descriptions and employers or employers’ associations
•
or:
1. ◦
  which consists wholly or mainly of:
  1. ‣
    constituent or affiliated organisations which fulfil the two conditions set out above (or themselves consist wholly or mainly of constituent or affiliated organisations which fulfil

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Employment News

National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Lords agree increase in salary sacrifice cap to £5,000

Pensions analysis: The House of Lords considered the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill at Report stage on 5 March 2026. The principal debates concerned non-government amendments to Clause 1, relating to employer pension contributions under optional remuneration arrangements in Great Britain, and Clause 2, which makes equivalent provision for Northern Ireland. The House of Lords agreed amendments increasing the cap from £2,000 to £5,000, exempting basic rate taxpayers, protecting student loan calculations, exempting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and charities, and strengthening parliamentary scrutiny of regulations, all of which the government had opposed on grounds of fiscal sustainability, fairness within the national insurance system, and administrative operability. Following the end of the Report Stage, a revised Bill was published on 5 March 2026 and it now moves to its Third Reading in the House of Lords on 12 March 2026.

Detailed list of Home Office’s Sponsor Guidance changes of 6 March 2026

Immigration analysis: On 6 March 2026, the Home Office issued new versions of each of the three principal Worker and Temporary Worker Sponsor Guidance documents, as well as of other Sponsor Guidance documents including Appendix D (on retaining documents) and the Sponsor a Skilled Worker guidance. We have set out below a detailed list of all of the substantive changes, as well as other wording changes which the Home Office appears to have made to focus sponsors’ minds on recent operational concerns, in light of the current significant increase in compliance checks and enforcement (eg around salary underpayment). One important change is the replacement of the ‘genuine vacancy’ concept with the newly defined term ‘eligible role’, now contained in a new standalone glossary document. The new four-limbed definition embeds skill, salary and route requirements, compliance with wider employment law, and proportionality to the sponsor’s business model into a continuing test that must be met throughout sponsorship. Other operational-related changes include around illegal working requirements, and reinforcing the importance of Certificate of Sponsorship details matching the work actually undertaken (or reporting permitted changes). The wording around the standard of proof for the enforcement threshold in some cases has also been amended to ‘reasonable suspicion’, presumably as an attempt to expand the Home Office’s discretion to refuse, suspend or revoke licences. Other suitability/compliance amendments relate to concerns about dishonesty, salary inflation or risks to the integrity of the sponsorship system. At the same time, the guidance emphasises that participation in the sponsorship scheme (now formally termed a ‘scheme’) is voluntary and that a licence is granted and held at the Home Office’s discretion. There is also an increased focus on worker welfare and compliance with wider UK law, including a new requirement to inform sponsored workers of their employment rights and retain evidence of having done so. It had been anticipated that further guidance would be included on when and how employers are permitted to ‘claw back’ some immigration costs in circumstances where a sponsored worker leaves their employment early, but there were no more changes made on this aspect in the new guidance.

Dyson settles factory workers forced labour claims

Law360, London: A group of workers suing Dyson over alleged forced labour when they made components at Malaysian factories have settled their claim against the electronics manufacturer, their lawyers said on 9 March 2026.

Extension of the right to work regime

Immigration analysis: The current right to work regime requires all employers to conduct checks on all employees to ensure that only those who are legally entitled to work in the UK are doing so. However, following the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025 (BSAIA 2025) being passed and receiving Royal Assent on 2 December 2025, BSAIA 2025, s 48 seeks to extend these obligations further to cover the non-employee workforce. This was subject to a public consultation looking at how the changes should be operationalised and enforced, and how processes could be simplified to make it easier for employers to fulfil their responsibilities. The consultation closed on 10 December 2025 and the results are awaited. This article explores the effects of BSAIA 2025, s 48 in practice and considers some of the issues raised in the consultation. Written by Sajida Hussain, legal director at Addleshaw Goddard.