The following Employment precedent provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
[ON YOUR LETTERHEAD]
[Name and address of other party, or other party’s solicitor]
Dear [insert contact name]
[Insert subject of letter, eg names of parties to the claim, or Your client: [name]]: Employment tribunal claim number: [insert number]
[[We refer to our previous correspondence in relation to these proceedings, OR We refer to the ET3 response form which our client has submitted to the employment tribunal in response to your [client’s ]claim,] in which we have [set out brief details of the party’s position, eg set out that the employment tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear your unfair dismissal claim because you do not have the required period of continuous employment with [enter name]]]
We write to put you on notice that, if [you continue OR your client continues] to pursue [the OR their][claim[s] for OR ground[s] of defence that][insert brief details, eg unfair dismissal, the claim is out of time], our client will make an application to the employment tribunal for a costs order to be made against [you OR your client OR , under Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
Rule 76(1) provides:
‘A Tribunal may make a costs order or a preparation time order, and shall conside
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
Case number [insert number][In the principal registryORIn the [insert court location] FAMILY court]Sitting at [insert place]Notice of actingBetween[insert petitioner name]Petitionerand[insert respondent name]RespondentTake notice that we [insert name of firm] have been appointed to act as the
This Practice Note considers the legal concept of mistake in contract law. It examines common mistake, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, mistake as to identity and mistake as to the document signed (non est factum). It also considers the impact of each of these types of mistake on the contract and
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.