Civil courts and alternative dispute resolution

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

STOP PRESS: The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, SI 2024/1155 (ET Rules 2024) in force from 6 January 2025, replaced the ET Rules 2013 set out in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, SI 2013/1237 from that date. The Employment Tribunals (Procedure Rules) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2024, SI 2024/1156, also in force from 6 January 2025, primarily amended the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, SI 2013/1237 to facilitate the coming into force of the ET Rules 2024. Presidential Guidance and Practice Directions will be amended to reflect the new rules in due course.

For a destination table showing how the ET Rules 2024 correspond to the ET Rules 2013, and incorporating notes on the changes, see Practice Note: Employment tribunal rules of procedure 2024—destination table. This subtopic will be updated in light of the ET Rules 2024 as soon as possible.

High Court and County Court employment claims

Most employment rights arise from statute and disputes relating to them are generally within the exclusive jurisdiction of the employment tribunal. This includes:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Lords vote to create duty to probe whistleblowers concerns

Law360: Employers would be obliged to investigate concerns raised by whistleblowers under an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill (ERB) put forward by the House of Lords.

Acas publishes annual report for 2024 to 2025

Acas has published its annual report for from 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.

MPs launch inquiry into enduring disability employment gap

Law360: Senior MPs have launched an inquiry into the persistent gap in employment between people who are disabled people and non-disabled people, calling for evidence and ideas on how to close it as part of a broader push to address labour inequality.

DBT launches call for evidence on unpaid work practices

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has launched a call for evidence seeking views on unpaid internships and related work practices. The consultation examines five key areas: unpaid internships and internships paid below the National Minimum Wage (NMW), unpaid work trials and work trials paid below NMW, voluntary workers, volunteers, and work shadowing. The call forms part of the government's commitment to ban unpaid internships unless part of educational or training courses. Running from 17 July to 9 October 2025, the consultation targets input from individuals with direct experience, worker groups, employers, businesses, and subject matter experts. The Department aims to publish its response by February 2026.

View Employment by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Interest in the employment tribunal

Interest in the employment tribunalThis Practice Note explains the circumstances in which:•an employment tribunal may award interest generally, as an integral part of the amount awarded in respect of the claim (see: Interest as a part of the award below)•interest accrues on any unpaid employment

Is correspondence with Acas during early conciliation without prejudice, or can it be used as evidence in

Is correspondence with Acas during early conciliation without prejudice, or can it be used as evidence in an employment tribunal claim?Under section 18(7) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (ETA 1996), anything communicated to an Acas conciliation officer in connection with the performance of the

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunals

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunalsThe tribunal has a mechanism, under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155, Rule 22, for dealing with the situation where a respondent either does not wish to contest a claim against it, or

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a provision preventing the employee from being re-employed by the same employer?There is no specific provision that makes it unlawful for a settlement agreement to include a provision preventing the
Interest in the employment tribunal

Interest in the employment tribunal

Interest in the employment tribunalThis Practice Note explains the circumstances in which:•an employment tribunal may award interest generally, as an integral part of the amount awarded in respect of the claim (see: Interest as a part of the award below)•interest accrues on any unpaid employment

Is correspondence with Acas during early conciliation without prejudice, or can it be used as evidence in

Is correspondence with Acas during early conciliation without prejudice, or can it be used as evidence in

Is correspondence with Acas during early conciliation without prejudice, or can it be used as evidence in an employment tribunal claim?Under section 18(7) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (ETA 1996), anything communicated to an Acas conciliation officer in connection with the performance of the

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunals

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunals

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunalsThe tribunal has a mechanism, under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155, Rule 22, for dealing with the situation where a respondent either does not wish to contest a claim against it, or

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a provision preventing the employee from being re-employed by the same employer?There is no specific provision that makes it unlawful for a settlement agreement to include a provision preventing the