Home / Employment / Practice, procedure and settlement / Employment Tribunals

Legal News

Third party required to disclose judgments and orders from separate but similar equal pay cases (News, 31 October 2016)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 31 October 2016

Published by a LexisNexis Employment expert

Table of contents

Impact of this case
Relevant law
Background facts and employment tribunal decision
Judgment of the EAT

Article summary

An Employment Judge was entitled to order disclosure by a third party of judgments and interlocutory orders relating to equal pay cases of a similar type to those being litigated by the claimants. The third party, Birmingham City Council, had been the claimants’ employer prior to their employment being TUPE 2006 transferred to their new employer, who is the respondent to the claims. EAT: Birmingham City Council v (1) Bagshaw and others, (2) The Arthur Terry Learning Partnership.

Popular documents

Responding to an appeal

Responding to an appealThe EAT will send to all parties who are respondents to the appeal:•the Notice of Appeal, with any amendments which have been permitted•any submissions or skeleton argument lodged by the appellantWithin 28 days of the seal date of the order, unless some other period is

Interest in the employment tribunal

Interest in the employment tribunalThis Practice Note explains the circumstances in which:•an employment tribunal may award interest generally, as an integral part of the amount awarded in respect of the claim (see: Interest as a part of the award below)•interest accrues on any unpaid employment

Employer's contract claim (counterclaim) in the employment tribunal

Employer's contract claim (counterclaim) in the employment tribunalThis Practice Note examines the circumstances in which an employer may make a contractual counterclaim against an employee in relation to a claim by the employee for breach of contract, under the Employment Tribunals Extension of

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a

Is it possible for a settlement agreement, entered into on termination of employment, to include a provision preventing the employee from being re-employed by the same employer?There is no specific provision that makes it unlawful for a settlement agreement to include a provision preventing the