Home / Financial Services

Legal News

New ESMA guidelines on the MiFID II compliance function

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 05 June 2020
Published by LNB News

LNB News 05/06/2020

Document Information

Issue Date: 05 June 2020

Published Date: 05 June 2020

Jurisdiction(s): United Kingdom

Article summary

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published final guidelines on the MiFID II compliance function. They replace the ESMA guidelines on the same topic issued in 2012 and aim to enhance clarity and foster greater convergence in the implementation and supervision of the new MiFID II compliance function requirements.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to