Employment Tribunals

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

The procedural rules for the bringing of, and responding to, claims in the employment tribunal, and their subsequent management and determination, are set out in the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155. For the early conciliation rules, see Practice Note: Early conciliation rules (rules applying from Sunday 20 April 2014).

The early conciliation requirement

Acas conciliation involves an independent Acas conciliation officer (also known as a conciliator) discussing the issues in dispute with both parties in order to help them reach a better understanding of each other's position. The conciliation officer tries to encourage the parties in dispute to come to an agreement between themselves so as to avoid the need for a tribunal hearing.

For further information on Acas conciliation generally, see Practice Note: Acas conciliation.

The early conciliation (EC) requirement (also known as mandatory Acas early conciliation) is an obligation on a prospective claimant to contact Acas with certain information prior to submitting a claim in the employment tribunal.

The EC requirement applies to 'relevant proceedings', ie:

  1. •

    those proceedings listed in section 18(1) Employment Tribunals Act 1996, which includes

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Council adopts new EU regulation to speed-up cross-border GDPR complaints

The Council of the EU has  adopted new legislation to enhance and expedite the handling of cross-border data protection complaints under the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (EU GDPR). The regulation harmonises rules on the admissibility of complaints, strengthens the procedural rights of complainants and organisations under investigation, and introduces a simplified cooperation mechanism for straightforward cases to reduce administrative burden. It also sets binding time limits, requiring most investigations to conclude within 15 months, extendable by 12 months for complex cases, and within 12 months for simplified procedures. Following the Council’s adoption, the measure completes the legislative process, entering into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the EU and applying 15 months thereafter, thereby reinforcing consistent and efficient enforcement of data protection rules across the EU.

Committee urges government to harness hybrid working potential and avoid over-regulation

The House of Lords Home-based Working Committee has published its report ‘Is working from home working?’ examining the effects and future development of remote and hybrid working across the UK. The Committee concludes that working from home, now a mainstream practice since the pandemic, could help the government’s wider ambition of bringing people back into work, particularly those with disabilities or long-term health conditions, if integrated effectively into existing employment initiatives.

Employment weekly highlights—13 November 2025

This edition of Employment weekly highlights includes: (1) a High Court finding of criminal contempt of court against a former Commerzbank employee who fabricated ET claims for sexual harassment and racial discrimination, (2) an EAT decision that a provisional liquidator’s appointment may trigger the disapplication of TUPE transfer and automatic unfair dismissal provisions, (3) the progress of the Employment Rights Bill through Parliament (ping pong), (4) the extension of a legal agreement between the EHRC and McDonald’s in relation to sexual harassment prevention, (5) a CAC decision clarifying that defective negotiating representative election under ICER 2004 do not trigger the standard information and consultation provisions, (6) an ECtHR finding of a breach of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) in relation to requests for information from a mobile phone operator, (7) dates for your diary, and (8) other news items of interest to employment practitioners.

Mcdonald’s told to do more to stop sexual harassment

Law360: The UK's equality watchdog said on 7 November 2025 it has asked McDonald's to do more to protect its staff from sexual harassment after 'serious allegations' emerged following an initial deal with the fast food giant.

View Employment by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

When submitting an ET3 response, is the respondent required to copy the claimant into the email, or is it

When submitting an ET3 response, is the respondent required to copy the claimant into the email, or is it sufficient to submit the ET3 response to the employment tribunal (ie does rule 92 apply in relation to submission of ET3)?The procedure relating to employment tribunal claims is governed by the

Making changes or additions to the claim or response: employment tribunals

Making changes or additions to the claim or response or reply: employment tribunalsFor a variety of reasons, a claimant or respondent may wish or need to:•make amendments to the contents of their ET1 claim form or ET3 response form or reply (to an employer’s counterclaim) after the initial lodging

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunals

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunalsThe tribunal has a mechanism, under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155, Rule 22, for dealing with the situation where a respondent either does not wish to contest a claim against it, or

Settlement, withdrawal, dismissal of claims and consent orders in the employment tribunal

Settlement, withdrawal, dismissal of claims and consent orders in the employment tribunalIn this Practice Note, where appropriate, references to ‘claimant’ include a respondent advancing a counterclaim and references to ‘respondent’ include a claimant replying to such a counterclaim.The parties
When submitting an ET3 response, is the respondent required to copy the claimant into the email, or is it

When submitting an ET3 response, is the respondent required to copy the claimant into the email, or is it

When submitting an ET3 response, is the respondent required to copy the claimant into the email, or is it sufficient to submit the ET3 response to the employment tribunal (ie does rule 92 apply in relation to submission of ET3)?The procedure relating to employment tribunal claims is governed by the

Making changes or additions to the claim or response: employment tribunals

Making changes or additions to the claim or response: employment tribunals

Making changes or additions to the claim or response or reply: employment tribunalsFor a variety of reasons, a claimant or respondent may wish or need to:•make amendments to the contents of their ET1 claim form or ET3 response form or reply (to an employer’s counterclaim) after the initial lodging

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunals

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunals

No response, rejected response or claim not contested: employment tribunalsThe tribunal has a mechanism, under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155, Rule 22, for dealing with the situation where a respondent either does not wish to contest a claim against it, or

Settlement, withdrawal, dismissal of claims and consent orders in the employment tribunal

Settlement, withdrawal, dismissal of claims and consent orders in the employment tribunal

Settlement, withdrawal, dismissal of claims and consent orders in the employment tribunalIn this Practice Note, where appropriate, references to ‘claimant’ include a respondent advancing a counterclaim and references to ‘respondent’ include a claimant replying to such a counterclaim.The parties