Supervision & file reviews

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Effective supervision is a regulatory requirement for law firms, as well as being good practice. It can help manage the risk of negligence, as well as other regulatory risks. File reviews are an effective supervision tool, but they are unlikely to be a complete answer to supervision.

Supervision

The SRA's core regulatory requirements in relation to supervision are found in the two Codes of Conduct (the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs, RFLs and RSLs and the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms), which should be read in the context of the SRA Principles. Requirements can also be found in the SRA Authorisation of Firms Rules, SRA Education, Training and Assessment Provider Relations, SRA Transparency Rules, and SRA Authorisation of Individuals Regulations.

Cumulatively, SRA and other regulatory requirements in relation to supervision cover the following themes:

  1. •

    management control

  2. •

    service and competence

  3. •

    information requirements

  4. •

    additional Lexcel requirements

  5. •

    education and training, and

  6. •

    supervision of registered foreign lawyers (RFLs)

  7. •

    file reviews

  8. •

    supervision of specific activities

See further Practice Note: Supervision—regulatory requirements—law firms which includes information on the characteristics of good supervision

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Practice Compliance News

NCA publishes guidance on indicators of foreign bribery

The National Crime Agency (NCA) has published new guidance produced by the International Foreign Bribery Taskforce (IFBT), which highlights key indicators of foreign bribery. The IFBT, which includes agencies from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US, developed the guidance to help members of the public and organisations, particularly those operating in high-risk sectors, identify potential indicators of foreign bribery and report concerns to the appropriate authorities. It highlights common red flags that may indicate bribery risks, including: (1) the use of third-party agents or shell companies; (2) unexplained large payments to overseas entities; (3) contracts awarded without competitive bidding; (4) excessive gifts or hospitality provided to politically exposed persons (PEPs); and (5) links to jurisdictions with high corruption or secrecy scores. The IFBT encourages prompt reporting of suspicious activity to relevant law enforcement or anti-corruption agencies.

SFO compliance guide highlights early remediation is key

Law360, Expert analysis: On 26 November 2025, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) released, for the first time, external guidance as to its evaluation of corporate compliance programmes. Tom Grodecki, partner at Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, explains the purpose and implications of the guidance, which highlights the SFO’s focus on practical, effective compliance measures, early remediation and the potential impact of compliance assessments on decisions around prosecution and DPAs.

LSB publishes consultation on 2026/27 business plan alongside State of Legal Services progress report

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has launched a consultation on its draft business plan and budget for 2026/27. It proposes a revised, proportionate and risk-based approach to regulatory oversight, focusing on underperforming regulators such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Bar Standards Board while reducing burdens on those performing well. The LSB also intends to strengthen professional ethics and diversity across the sector, and enhance consumer protection in response to emerging risks, including through exploration of AI-powered consumer tools. The draft plan is structured around four objectives: delivering targeted and effective regulatory oversight; focusing policy work where it can have the greatest impact; improving strategic capability through horizon-scanning and research, including development of a three-year plan; and enhancing organisational efficiency and use of technology. The consultation closes on 11 February 2026.

CILEX appeals Mazur judgment as hearing date confirmed

The Court of Appeal has confirmed the hearing date for Chartered Institute of Legal Executives' (CILEX) appeal against the Mazur judgment, scheduled for 24 February 2026. The decision has significant implications for legal professionals, law firms, and access to justice, particularly given the judgment's controversial impact on legal precedent. Although CILEX was not directly involved in the initial proceedings, the organization has been granted permission to appeal. Leading legal practitioners, acting pro bono, will represent CILEX, highlighting the case's potential to influence the broader legal landscape.

View Practice Compliance by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid