Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of the judgment?
- What was the background?
- What did the Supreme Court decide?
Article summary
Employment analysis: Daniel Stilitz QC, barrister at 11KBW, and Chris Milsom, at Cloisters, examine the Supreme Court’s decision in Gilham v Ministry of Justice that a district judge was entitled to claim the protection given to whistleblowers under Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial