Table of contents
- Impact of this case
- Relevant background law
- The facts and decisions of the employment tribunal and EAT
- The costs judgment of the EAT
Article summary
The EAT will not make an order for reimbursement of costs in respect of issue and/or hearing fees if they have been paid by an appellant’s union rather than by the appellant directly. This is because, under Rule 34A(2A) of the EAT Rules, an order for reimbursement of costs can only be made in respect of fees actually paid by the appellant. EAT: Goldwater v Sellafield.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial