Pensions

This Overview outlines the Practice Note material available in our Pensions subtopic.

Pensions—general considerations for employment lawyers

Payment into pension schemes that are registered with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has significant tax advantages for both employers and employees (see: ‘The pensions tax regime’ below). Pension schemes are also a way of attracting and retaining employees.

Under European law pension benefits are considered to be deferred pay, so they are subject to the principle of 'equal pay for equal work'. A significant amount of indirect discrimination litigation has occurred in the past few years; the majority of which had been brought by part-time workers, the majority of whom are women.

Employers may run occupational pension schemes for the benefit of their employees. Occupational pension schemes tend to be either 'final salary' (also known as 'defined benefit') schemes or 'money purchase' (also known as 'defined contribution') schemes:

  1. final salary schemes commit the scheme, under the deed and rules, to paying members a set annuity on retirement

  2. money purchase schemes require employees and employers to pay a set amount each year into the scheme, usually expressed as a percentage of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

House of Commons publishes motions ahead of consideration of Employment Rights Bill on 8 December

The House of Commons on 5 December published motions relating to Lords amendments to the Employment Rights Bill (ERB), in advance of its consideration of the those amendments on 8 December (to be followed by a swift ping-pong back to the Lords, expected on 10 December).The government amendments include: guaranteed hours offers for zero hours workers—the government has offered a concession in the form of consultation on the initial reference period unfair dismissal—in addition to the reduction of the qualifying period from two years to six months (rather than its removal altogether), the government amendments would remove the unfair dismissal compensation cap entirely by omitting section 124 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996)reasons for dismissal for which there is no qualifying period—the government proposes to include in the list of reasons in ERA 1996, s 108(3) dismissal for failure to disclose a spent conviction or ancillary circumstances seasonal workers—the government proposes to consult with those representing the interests of seasonal workers and their employers before making regulations contributions to political funds from union members—the government amendments provide for an opt-out notice to be given on a day specified in, or determined by, the trade union’s rules, and for the Secretary of State to publish guidance (within three months of the measures coming into force about the kind of provision which the Secretary of State considers it is appropriate for the rules of a trade union to make for these purposes industrial action balloting—the government amendments require the Secretary of State, before bringing regulations into force to have regard to the effect provision for balloting other than by post on the proportion of those eligible to vote in such ballots doing so a number of MPs have tabled an amendment that the Commons should insist on the removal of the unfair dismissal qualifying period.

View Employment by content type :

Popular documents