Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this judgment?
- What is the relevant background?
- Background law
- Background facts
- The decisions of the employment tribunal and the EAT
- What did the Court of Appeal decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Employment analysis: An unrepresented litigant was at fault for not having read and followed the Court guidance on how to appeal from the employment tribunal to the EAT and accordingly the correct decision had been taken not to extend time for his appeal which was lodged 42 days out of time because he had not checked that his original appeal had been received (as suggested in the guidance) and it had been lost in the post, according to the Court of Appeal.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial