Cross-border, international and jurisdictional issues

This topic provides guidance on some of the key cross-border, international and jurisdictional issues that may be encountered in the employment context.

Employee working wholly or partly abroad

Where a dispute or claim arises in respect of an employee who works wholly or partly abroad and/or has a foreign employer, two questions will need to be determined:

  1. what are the employee’s rights?

  2. where should any litigation that may ultimately arise be adjudicated?

In determining these questions, three main issues arise:

  1. applicable law, ie which system of law is applicable to the contract of employment under consideration?

  2. international jurisdiction, ie whose courts and/or tribunals should decide the case?

  3. the territorial scope of relevant applicable or mandatory law, ie how the courts and employment tribunals decide what statutory rights (if any) the employee has, both in terms of:

    1. purely domestic law rights, and

    2. rights derived from EU law

EU-derived laws applicable in the UK are assimilated law. For further information, see Practice Note: Assimilated law.

It is important to understand that the applicable law and jurisdiction are

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Employment weekly highlights—23 October 2025

This edition of Employment weekly highlights includes: (1) a revised draft regulation amending the list of bodies to which permitted disclosures can be made under section 17 of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024, (2) a further draft regulation replacing VPA 2024, s 17 in its entirety, to allow a victim of criminal conduct (or a person who reasonably believes they are a victim) to make a disclosure to anyone (including family, friends, employers and journalists), for any purpose, (3) EAT decisions highlighting the need for clarity when a disciplinary process is initiated during notice period and providing a reminder that a debarred respondent should generally be able to participate in a remedy hearing, (4) news that the DBT has ‘named and shamed’ 491 companies for failing to pay the national minimum wage, (5) a joint submission by the Trans Advocacy and Complaints Collective and the Trans Exile Network to the Council of Europe’s Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law, asking it to reopen enforcement of ECHR judgments in Goodwin v UK and Grant v UK, (6) a letter from the EHRC to the Minister for Women and Equalities, urging her to approve the updated Code of Practice for services etc without further delay, (7) a letter from the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O’Flaherty, to the Chairs of the Joint Committee on Human Rights and of the Women and Equalities Committee outlining concerns about the current climate for trans people in the UK, (8) a planned employment tribunal outage on 11 November 2025, (9) a new playbook for a pro-client, company-to-company consultancy agreement, (10) dates for your diary, and (11) other news items of interest to employment practitioners.

View Employment by content type :

Popular documents