- The Ghosh test—are cheating and dishonesty synonymous? (Ivey v Genting Casinos)
- Original news
- What was the background to the case?
- What issue arose for the court’s consideration?
- What did the court decide, and why?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area? Are there still any unresolved issues practitioners will need to watch out for?
- What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area?
Dispute Resolution analysis: Can a gambler cheat without being dishonest? Siward Atkins, of Maitland Chambers, explores the Supreme Court’s answer in Ivey v Genting Casinos and considers the importance of its abolition of the Ghosh test for dishonesty.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial