Table of contents
- Original news
- What was the background to the case?
- What issue arose for the court’s consideration?
- What did the court decide, and why?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area? Are there still any unresolved issues practitioners will need to watch out for?
- What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area?
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: Can a gambler cheat without being dishonest? Siward Atkins, of Maitland Chambers, explores the Supreme Court’s answer in Ivey v Genting Casinos and considers the importance of its abolition of the Ghosh test for dishonesty.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial