Contract interpretation—the parol evidence rule
Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert
Practice notesContract interpretation—the parol evidence rule
Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert
Practice notesIn addition to the guiding principles on Contract interpretation provided by Lord Hoffmann in ICS (see Practice Note: Contract interpretation—the guiding principles), further Rules have been developed as aids to contract interpretation. The starting point is the parol evidence rule, which restricts the Admissibility of extrinsic evidence as a means of adding to, varying or contradicting a written agreement.
For related information on issues of admissibility, see Practice Notes:
- •
Contract interpretation—admissibility of surrounding documents
- •
Contract interpretation—admissibility of pre-contractual negotiations and statements
Parol evidence rule—what is it?
The parol evidence rule provides that, where parties have a signed agreement, it is not generally permissible to adduce extrinsic evidence to:
- •
show what the parties’ intention was in entering that agreement (Prenn v Simmonds)
- •
contradict, vary or add to the terms of the written agreement—this extends to implied terms (Jacobs v Batavia)
The parol evidence rule only applies in respect of written contracts.
The parol evidence rule operates to exclude not only oral evidence, but all forms of evidence outside
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.