Protecting confidential information

The Practice Notes in this subtopic consider the protection of data and information, whether that data is confidential and/or personal. The content includes:

  1. protecting confidential information—identifying confidential information, how it may be protected and the steps that can be taken once the confidentiality has been breached, including any remedial action through the courts

  2. protecting personal data—in light of the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) and the UK General Data Protection Regulation, Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (UK GDPR) (and with some reference too to the General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (EU GDPR))

The content in this subtopic is intended to provide an overview of the confidential information and data protection issues as they may arise for dispute resolution lawyers (and includes specific content on disclosure related issues). For detailed guidance on privacy, confidentiality and data protection regimes more generally, see:

  1. Confidential information—overview

  2. Privacy and misuse of private information—overview

  3. Data protection regime—overview

What is confidential information—general principles

What amounts to confidential information is dependant on the concepts of the duty of fidelity and what comprises information.

The protection

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Third party costs—Court of Appeal confirms stay pending detailed assessment is case management decision (Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of a judge at first instance to stay an application for a third-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 until after the conclusion of the detailed assessment of the underlying bill of costs. Dismissing Nigeria’s appeal, the Court of Appeal held that there is no presumption that a third-party costs application should be determined before a detailed assessment. The question is purely one of case management, to be decided in accordance with the interests of justice and the overriding objective. The decision, being within the scope of discretion allowed a judge, was not amenable to appeal; that a different judge would have reached a different conclusion was not in point. Where there is a real question whether any further sum will be payable following assessment (particularly where a substantial payment on account has already been made and costs are to be assessed on the standard basis), it is legitimate to stay the third party application to avoid wasting court resources on what may prove to be a pointless satellite exercise. Of general and at least equal significance to costs practitioners were the Court of Appeal’s strong comments (obiter dicta in strict terms) deprecating disproportionate detailed assessment processes and endorsing the use of sampling as a case management tool in cases involving very significant bills of legal costs. Written by Lauren Godfrey, barrister at Gatehouse Chambers.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents