Tort and negligence

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This subtopic covers general torts, negligence and nuisance.

For a summary in tabular form of some of the more illustrative decisions in negligence claims (as from 1 January 2020), see Practice Notes:

  1. •

    Negligence claims—illustrative decisions (2025)

  2. •

    Negligence claims—illustrative decisions (2020–2024) [Archived]

What are claims in tort?

Definition and background

The two key and mutually supporting functions of tort law are to:

  1. •

    compensate people when their rights are infringed, and

  2. •

    provide a mechanism for redress, to thereby define and uphold those rights

The courts strive to strike a balance between promoting corrective justice and remedying wrongs on the one hand and not contributing to the creation of an overly litigious society that believes there must be a remedy for every misfortune on the other. In attempting to achieve this, judges consider the balance of risk and responsibility at both an individual and a societal level.

Tort law seeks to provide protection of varying degrees for physical and mental health, personal property and real property (ie land) as well as personal privacy and reputation.

For further guidance on the evolution of tort

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Glencore ruling affirms disclosure trumps prosecution fears

Law360, London: A recent High Court decision that forced Glencore to hand over documents obtained from a Dutch investigation provides further evidence of the difficulties companies face when they try to resist disclosure in civil proceedings by pointing to the risk of prosecution overseas.

190th Practice Direction update—online civil claims—in force 16 September 2025

The 190th Practice Direction update comes into force at 11am on 16 September 2025. This update introduces changes to amend CPR PD 51R (the Online Civil Money Claims Pilot) and CPR PD 51ZB (the Damages Claims Pilot). The changes to CPR PD 51R expand the case progression and general applications features to all County Courts. The update also makes minor tidying up amendments to CPR PD 51R and CPR PD 51ZB.

Court’s power to grant anonymity orders in personal injury litigation to ensure the proper administration of justice (PMC v Cwm Taf Mogannwg UHB)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: The Court of Appeal has clarified the law on granting anonymity orders as part of the court’s inherent jurisdiction, overturning the first instance decision which had cast doubt on the guidance provided by the Court of Appeal in X v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, in which it established the general rule for granting anonymity orders made post-settlement in advance of approval hearings for protected parties in personal injury cases. At first instance, Mr Justice Nicklin held that the court had very limited powers to make an anonymity order in personal injury litigation and that it was not appropriate to make such an order in the case of PMC, where the claimant’s case had been much publicised in the press. Written by Robert Weir KC, barrister at Devereux Chambers.

HMCTS publishes guidance for legal professionals on defending, admitting and managing money claims in the OCMC under CPR PD 51R

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published comprehensive guidance for legal professionals on using the MyHMCTS platform to manage money claims up to £25,000 using the Online Civil Money Claims Pilot (OCMC) under CPR PD 51R. Released on 15 September 2025, the guidance outlines procedures for defending, admitting, and managing online money claims via the digital service. It details technical processes, including the submission of extension of time applications, document uploads, trial bundle management and mediation arrangements.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?The tort of conversionThe tort of conversion is concerned with cases where one person (D) has misappropriated goods belonging to another (C).It requires the existence of three elements:•D’s

Misrepresentation—damages as a remedy

Misrepresentation—damages as a remedyThis Practice Note considers when damages are available as a remedy for a misrepresentation claim with reference to the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA 1967).For consideration of when the courts will rescind a contract for misrepresentation and when parties can

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claims

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the requirement for causation as part of establishing a viable claim in tort, including in negligence claims. It considers the aspects of factual causation: including the ‘but for’ test, evidencing it and its limits,
Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?The tort of conversionThe tort of conversion is concerned with cases where one person (D) has misappropriated goods belonging to another (C).It requires the existence of three elements:•D’s

Misrepresentation—damages as a remedy

Misrepresentation—damages as a remedy

Misrepresentation—damages as a remedyThis Practice Note considers when damages are available as a remedy for a misrepresentation claim with reference to the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA 1967).For consideration of when the courts will rescind a contract for misrepresentation and when parties can

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claims

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claims

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the requirement for causation as part of establishing a viable claim in tort, including in negligence claims. It considers the aspects of factual causation: including the ‘but for’ test, evidencing it and its limits,