Transferring contracts and rights of third parties

How, when and why a contract may be changed or transferred or affected by third parties may arise in any number of differing scenarios, eg:

•
when a dispute is brewing between parties, one avenue that is often explored is the renegotiation of terms
•
group reorganisations may result in the need to vary, transfer or novate agreements and there may be occasions when the other party to the contract seeks to challenge that novation or transfer as a means of exiting the contract at no cost to themselves
•
contracts are not necessarily immune from attack by third parties either—there can be exceptions to the 'privity of contract' rule, particularly where the contract itself confers a benefit on a third party

The following series of Practice Notes seek to address the key issues that can arise in such scenarios.

For a summary, in tabular form, of key and/or illustrative cases on contractual disputes (for judgments dating 1 January 2020 onwards), see Practice Notes:

•
Contract disputes—key and illustrative decisions (2024–2025)
•
Contract disputes—key and illustrative decisions (2020–2023)

The methods of transferring contracts

Over

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Dispute Resolution News

No harm, no foul? Court of Appeal provides clarifications around controllers’ liability in the context of compensation claims under Article 82 of the UK GDPR (Farley and others v Paymaster (1836) Ltd (trading as Equiniti) (Information Commissioner intervening))

Information Law analysis: In a landmark ruling, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court decision which denied compensation to individuals affected by a data breach. The judgment contains helpful clarifications regarding compensation claims made pursuant to Article 82 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR), including the requirements for establishing UK GDPR infringement, the scope of non-material damage and, more broadly, the position of the UK courts in relation to EU Court of Justice case law and its application in the context of domestic data protection rules. The Court of Appeal held that bringing a UK GDPR infringement claim does not require proof that personal data was actually disclosed to third parties. Unlawful processing is a sufficient basis in principle for damage to be suffered. There is also no minimum threshold for non-material damage when it comes to a data subject’s entitlement to compensation under Article 82 of the UK GDPR. The scope of such damage can include an objective, well-founded fear or apprehension of misuse of personal data. This judgment is also a helpful reminder of the broad scope of activities that fall within the concept of processing and the importance of controllers’ compliance with Articles 24, 25 and 32 of the UK GDPR and the general principles in Article 5(1) of the UK GDPR. Written by Marija Nonkovic, associate at Kemp IT Law.

Lady Chief Justice responds to Bar Council's bullying and harassment review

The Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales has responded to the Bar Council’s Independent Review of Bullying, Harassment and Discrimination at the Bar—which was published on 8 September 2025 and conducted by Baroness Harriet Harman KC. The review revealed multiple instances of judicial bullying and put forward several recommendations aimed at the Bar Council, the judiciary, and other relevant bodies to tackle and mitigate bullying within the legal profession. In her response, The Rt Hon the Baroness Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill reaffirmed her commitment to a modern, diverse, and inclusive judiciary. She strongly condemned judicial bullying as unacceptable and outlined ongoing measures, including the review of complaint procedures, the expansion of inclusion training, and enhanced support for judges—particularly those in leadership roles—to ensure that all judicial office holders maintain the highest standards of integrity, fairness, and respect in the justice system.

RTA Small Claims Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) updates—in force 1 October 2025

The Master of the Rolls has approved the amendments to the Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims below the Small Claims Limit in Road Traffic Accidents (RTA Small Claims Protocol), effective from 1 October 2025. The amendments deal with the treatment of non-Protocol vehicle costs (NVC) within the Official Injury Claim Portal. Previously, both claimants and compensators were required to manually upload NVC forms. Under the revised protocol, the portal will now automatically generate these forms using data provided by both parties, thereby streamlining the process and reducing the administrative burden.