Contractual breach and remedies

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

When faced with a breach or a potential breach of contract, one of the central issues will be what remedies are available to the innocent party.

The Practice Notes in this sub-topic consider the key remedies available, ie:

  1. •

    damages for breach of contract and the limits to recovery, and

  2. •

    the equitable remedies such as specific performance, declaratory and injunctive relief, rectification and rescission

as well as some of the issues relevant to a finding on liability. They also include some practical illustrations of pursuing certain types of contractual claim.

Clearly, before there can be a situation requiring remedies for a breach of contract, there needs to have been a contract in existence at some point. This subtopic proceeds on the basis that a binding agreement has already been entered into between the parties and then breached or that a dispute has arisen in relation to performance. It therefore does not deal with the issues of formation, interpretation or termination of contracts. For guidance on these topics, see:

  1. •

    Forming enforceable contracts—overview

  2. •

    Contract interpretation—overview

  3. •

    Terminating contracts—how and when a contract ends—overview (which

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—31 July 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the 185th, 186th and 187th Practice Direction updates to the Civil Procedure Rules and the Court of Appeal decision in Mold Investments Ltd v Holloway (evidence and interim injunction application); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

MoJ releases policy paper outlining AI action plan for justice system

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published a policy paper setting out its AI action plan for justice across England and Wales. The policy paper outlines how the MOJ will harness AI to transform the justice system by delivering swifter, fairer and more accessible public services. This plan establishes three strategic priorities: strengthening foundational AI capabilities through improved leadership, governance, ethical frameworks, and digital infrastructure; embedding AI across the justice system to enhance operational efficiency, personalise services, and support better decision-making; and investing in skills, talent, and partnerships to ensure effective and responsible AI adoption. The plan has been developed in consultation with the judiciary, legal services regulators, and other justice sector partners. It also supports wider government initiatives aimed at modernising public services while safeguarding public trust, human rights, and the rule of law.

SocGen settles €140m Clifford Chance negligence claim

Law360, London: Société Générale SA and Clifford Chance LLP have settled their €140m dispute over the bank's allegations that the law firm gave negligent advice that caused its claim in a multimillion-dollar dispute over gold bullion to be struck out as an abuse of process.

Applications under CPR 40.9—when is a non-party ‘directly affected’? Jones v Persons Unknown

Dispute Resolution analysis: In Jones v Persons Unknown, the Circuit Commercial Court heard an application, pursuant to CPR 40.9, for the setting aside of a judgment by an innocent non-party whose assets had been deployed by a judgment debtor in satisfaction of a debt owed to the claimant. The judgment summarises the law applicable to applications under CPR 40.9 and, in particular, the potentially narrow interpretation of the requirement for a party to be ‘directly affected’ by the order of which the setting aside is sought. In this case, where the impact on the applicant was directly attributable not to the judgment in question, but to the actions of a judgment debtor in seeking to satisfy the judgment, the application failed. Had it not failed on that limb of the applicable test, the court found that it would have failed on discretionary grounds, there being issues both with the merits of the applicant’s argument and with the applicant’s failure to pursue it promptly. Written by Emily Lodge, senior associate at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?The tort of conversionThe tort of conversion is concerned with cases where one person (D) has misappropriated goods belonging to another (C).It requires the existence of three elements:•D’s

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clauses

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clausesParties may often seek to specify that the entirety of their contractual relationship is governed by the written contract they have signed. This is what is known as an ‘entire agreement clause’. This Practice Note considers why they are used and some

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well
Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?

Can the tort of conversion apply where one individual took money from another individual's bank account?The tort of conversionThe tort of conversion is concerned with cases where one person (D) has misappropriated goods belonging to another (C).It requires the existence of three elements:•D’s

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clauses

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clauses

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clausesParties may often seek to specify that the entirety of their contractual relationship is governed by the written contract they have signed. This is what is known as an ‘entire agreement clause’. This Practice Note considers why they are used and some

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well