Insolvency for dispute resolution lawyers

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

The content in this subtopic is intended to assist a dispute resolution lawyer navigate the issues and wider strategic considerations which might arise in the context of disputes involving financially distressed and/or insolvent parties.

Impact of insolvency on litigation

It is important to observe at the outset that there is no general prohibition on issuing or pursuing any claims (whether original claims, additional claims or counterclaims) against ‘insolvent’ parties. Insolvency is a question of fact and individuals and companies may shift from solvency to insolvency at various times without any legal consequences as regards parties who may wish to bring claims against them. However, when a company or an individual enters into a formal insolvency process or debt management regime, restrictions may be imposed on the ability of other parties to bring, or continue with, claims against that company or individual.

For general guidance concerning the impact of insolvency processes on litigation, see: Claims against insolvent companies and individuals—overview, as well as Practice Notes:

  1. •

    What effect does an insolvency process have on ongoing litigation and arbitration proceedings?

  2. •

    Comparison

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

CPRC launches consultation on electronic service modernisation for CPR 6 and CPR PD 6A

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) has launched a consultation on proposed amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), focusing on modernising service of documents. The consultation proposes two key changes to CPR 6 and CPR PD 6A: first, requiring legal representatives who have confirmed their authority to accept service on behalf of a client to accept service by electronic means without needing further consent; and second, removing fax as a primary method of electronic service, reflecting the widespread use of email. The consultation closes on 12 September 2025.

Judge’s case to shine light on secretive selection process

Law360, London: A judge's challenge on 2 July 2025 to the lawfulness of a secretive process used to appoint judges will shine a light on part of the UK legal system that is often criticised but largely opaque.

UK Supreme Court publishes podcast featuring insights from Judicial Assistants

The UK Supreme Court has published a new podcast featuring two of its Judicial Assistants (JAs) discussing their work at the court. The podcast explores the JAs' daily responsibilities, including conducting legal research, drafting bench memoranda for permission to appeal applications and preparing press summaries. It also covers their experiences meeting US Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch during their annual visit to Washington. The content aims to provide listeners with behind-the-scenes insights into the operations of the UK's highest court.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—3 July 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the Hague Judgments Convention coming into force for the UK and the Court of Appeal decision in AmTrust Specialty Ltd v Endurance Worldwide Insurance Ltd (disclosure scheme in the Business and Property Courts); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claimsIntroductory observationsClaims for knowing receipt (sometimes also known as ‘unconscionable receipt’) and for dishonest assistance are sometimes referred to as ‘accessory liability’ claims in that they involve pursuing a defendant who has been involved

Loss of chance damages

Loss of chance damagesThis Practice Note considers in detail when damages for loss of a chance (loss of an opportunity damages) may be recoverable, with reference to the test in Allied Maples v Simmons & Simmons, its further consideration in Wellesley v Withers and the Supreme Court’s

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well
Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claimsIntroductory observationsClaims for knowing receipt (sometimes also known as ‘unconscionable receipt’) and for dishonest assistance are sometimes referred to as ‘accessory liability’ claims in that they involve pursuing a defendant who has been involved

Loss of chance damages

Loss of chance damages

Loss of chance damagesThis Practice Note considers in detail when damages for loss of a chance (loss of an opportunity damages) may be recoverable, with reference to the test in Allied Maples v Simmons & Simmons, its further consideration in Wellesley v Withers and the Supreme Court’s

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well