Actionable misrepresentation and negligent misstatement

The Practice Notes in this subtopic consider claims brought for misrepresentation (whether innocent, negligent or fraudulently made) and for negligent misstatement and the tort of deceit; and the various exclusions of liability, defences and remedies that may be available.

What is a misrepresentation and comparison with similar claims

A claim for misrepresentation arises where one party to a contract (the representor) made an untrue statement of fact that induced the other (the representee) to enter into the contract.

Claims for misrepresentation are governed by both the common law and the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA 1967).

Where there has been a misrepresentation, the representee has a right to rescind the contract whether the misrepresentation was made:

•
fraudulently—where the misrepresentation was made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to its truth. The claimant may have the contract rescinded and seek damages
•
negligently—where the misrepresentation was made carelessly or without the representor having reasonable grounds for believing its truth. Under MA 1967, s 2(1) the claimant may seek rescission and/or damages
•
innocently—where a misrepresentation was made but the representor can show

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Dispute Resolution News

AmTrust wins disclosure appeal in £56m claim-funding clash

Law360, London: A London appeals court said on 19 June 2025 that AmTrust should be able to see another insurer's communications with two law firms amid a £56m battle over who should cover the costs of a failed litigation-funding scheme.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—26 June 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa (Court of Appeal unfair prejudice decision), The New Lottery Company Ltd v The Gambling Commission (appropriate security for costs applicants), Vietjet Aviation Joint Stock Company v FW Aviation (limits of appellate jurisdiction) and discussion of the potential impact of AI-driven fake evidence in litigation; dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

Judiciary's BSA Working Group proposes amendments to TCC Guide for Building Safety Act claims

The Building Safety Act (BSA) Working Group has submitted proposed amendments to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) Guide to address practical issues for proceedings rely on Part V of the Building Safety Act 2022. The changes:

Law Society publishes final report on civil justice reform with six key recommendations

The Law Society of England and Wales has published its final report from the 21st Century Justice Project, which was initiated in 2022 to explore reforms aimed at improving access to civil justice. The report outlines six key recommendations designed to modernise the system and address longstanding barriers, particularly for individuals on lower incomes and for small businesses. The Law Society calls for the creation of a single, trusted online platform to guide users through legal issues and proposes the establishment of an online dispute resolution ombudsman. It also urges the government to embrace technology-enabled justice—ensuring ethical oversight of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal services—and to foster collaboration between legal professionals and technology providers. A central recommendation is the reform of civil legal aid, which the Law Society describes as underfunded and strained. The report advocates for inflation-linked fee increases, simplified processes and improved trust between the Legal Aid Agency and practitioners. It also highlights the potential of ombudsman schemes to resolve disputes more efficiently, recommending that the sector be rationalised to improve user navigation and effectiveness. Furthermore, the Law Society addresses the increasing use of unbundled legal services by suggesting that clearer guidance and enhanced data collection are needed to manage associated risks. It recommends increasing awareness and usage of legal expenses insurance by encouraging solicitors to routinely verify whether clients hold such policies.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

News