Actionable misrepresentation and negligent misstatement

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

The Practice Notes in this subtopic consider claims brought for misrepresentation (whether innocent, negligent or fraudulently made) and for negligent misstatement and the tort of deceit; and the various exclusions of liability, defences and remedies that may be available.

What is a misrepresentation and comparison with similar claims

A claim for misrepresentation arises where one party to a contract (the representor) made an untrue statement of fact that induced the other (the representee) to enter into the contract.

Claims for misrepresentation are governed by both the common law and the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA 1967).

Where there has been a misrepresentation, the representee has a right to rescind the contract whether the misrepresentation was made:

  1. •

    fraudulently—where the misrepresentation was made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to its truth. The claimant may have the contract rescinded and seek damages

  2. •

    negligently—where the misrepresentation was made carelessly or without the representor having reasonable grounds for believing its truth. Under MA 1967, s 2(1) the claimant may seek rescission and/or damages

  3. •

    innocently—where a misrepresentation was made but the representor can show

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Sir Geoffrey Vos gives evidence to Lords Constitution Committee on rule of law

The Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice, Sir Geoffrey Vos, appeared before the House of Lords Constitution Committee to provide evidence for their rule of law inquiry. Sir Geoffrey Vos detailed plans to modernise civil justice in England and Wales. He outlined three key priorities: expanding digital platforms in County Court, replacing the CE-File system with AI-enabled case management and developing a pre-court digital justice system. Currently only 11% of County Court cases use digital systems. Sir Geoffrey Vos reported that Civil Automatic Referral to Mediation (CARM) has been implemented for claims under £10,000, with a 37-38% success rate since becoming mandatory.

Decoding arbitral disputes—UK injunctions across borders

Law360, London: This article is part of a monthly column that delves into the most critical cross-border investment and commercial European disputes over arbitral award enforcement. In this installment, I analyze the High Court's reasoning in JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v VTB Bank PJSC.

Afghan nationals prepare to sue Ministry of Defence over data breach

Law360, London: Barings Law is preparing to bring a mass data-breach claim against the Ministry of Defence after the names of Afghans applying to relocate to the UK was inadvertently leaked, it was revealed when a ban that restricted reporting was lifted on 15 July 2025.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—17 July 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the Court of Appeal decisions in Berge Bulk Shipping PTE Ltd v Taumata Plantations Ltd (undisclosed principals) and Phones 4U Ltd v EE Ltd (appealing delayed judgments); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claimsIntroductory observationsClaims for knowing receipt (sometimes also known as ‘unconscionable receipt’) and for dishonest assistance are sometimes referred to as ‘accessory liability’ claims in that they involve pursuing a defendant who has been involved

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimThis Practice Note outlines the key elements for establishing a claim in negligence. For specific guidance on negligence in the context of company/parent company liability, banks and in professional negligence cases, see:•Practice Note: Tortious

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well
Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claimsIntroductory observationsClaims for knowing receipt (sometimes also known as ‘unconscionable receipt’) and for dishonest assistance are sometimes referred to as ‘accessory liability’ claims in that they involve pursuing a defendant who has been involved

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimThis Practice Note outlines the key elements for establishing a claim in negligence. For specific guidance on negligence in the context of company/parent company liability, banks and in professional negligence cases, see:•Practice Note: Tortious

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well