Debt claims

Introduction to debts

The concept of a debt is universally understood making it unnecessary to define. However, in law the word ‘debt’ has a particular meaning and it is important to stipulate what is caught by this term because debts are subject to rules that do not apply to other types of claim.

In essence, a debt is an agreed sum that is due under the terms of a contract, but that simple definition belies the complexity that can arise in categorising certain contractual claims. For detailed guidance on defining debt claims and distinguishing between claims in debt and claims in damages, as well as the role of a claim for an account stated, see Practice Note: Debt claims.

Discharging debts

Once a debt falls due for payment, the debtor needs to discharge the debt

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Third party costs—Court of Appeal confirms stay pending detailed assessment is case management decision (Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of a judge at first instance to stay an application for a third-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 until after the conclusion of the detailed assessment of the underlying bill of costs. Dismissing Nigeria’s appeal, the Court of Appeal held that there is no presumption that a third-party costs application should be determined before a detailed assessment. The question is purely one of case management, to be decided in accordance with the interests of justice and the overriding objective. The decision, being within the scope of discretion allowed a judge, was not amenable to appeal; that a different judge would have reached a different conclusion was not in point. Where there is a real question whether any further sum will be payable following assessment (particularly where a substantial payment on account has already been made and costs are to be assessed on the standard basis), it is legitimate to stay the third party application to avoid wasting court resources on what may prove to be a pointless satellite exercise. Of general and at least equal significance to costs practitioners were the Court of Appeal’s strong comments (obiter dicta in strict terms) deprecating disproportionate detailed assessment processes and endorsing the use of sampling as a case management tool in cases involving very significant bills of legal costs. Written by Lauren Godfrey, barrister at Gatehouse Chambers.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents