The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Claims for knowing receipt (sometimes also known as ‘unconscionable receipt’) and for dishonest assistance are sometimes referred to as ‘accessory liability’ in that they involve pursuing a defendant who has been involved in causing loss to the claimant in an accessory or secondary role, either through receiving trust property in the knowledge that it comes following a breach of trust or breach of fiduciary duty or by dishonestly assisting another to breach their trust or fiduciary duties to the claimant—in this way the defendant’s potential liability is by way of accessory to the main event of the breach of trust or of fiduciary duty.
Such claims are often pursued in the context of some manner of fraudulent or wrongful behaviour somewhere along the line in which the defendant has become involved. Accordingly, such claims are therefore sometimes pursued as well as, or in the alternative to, pursuing criminal sanction.
Dishonest assistance requires a dishonest mental state on the part of the defendant, knowing receipt requires knowledge as to the circumstances in which the defendant received property. The requirements for establishing such claims are considered in more detail below.
When a third party (the defendant) receives assets which have been disposed of in breach trust or breach of fiduciary duty but contends that the assets have been
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
No deal Brexit—jurisdiction (UK and the Lugano Convention) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note has been produced in partnership with Guy Pendell, Liz Williams and Kushal Gandhi of CMS.This Practice Note covers the situation where the UK
Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and
0330 161 1234