Home / Dispute Resolution / Claims and remedies / The doctrine of res judicata

Legal News

No abuse of process in running same arguments in possession and sale hearing as run in earlier charging order proceedings (The Law Society v Dua)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 06 January 2021

Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert

Table of contents

What are the practical implications of this case?
What was the background?
What did the court decide?
Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: Court permits a husband to argue at the trial of a possession and sale claim that his wife had no beneficial interest in properties despite his wife having unsuccessfully argued the same point at a final charging order hearing. Written by Phillip Patterson, barrister, Hardwicke.

Popular documents

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claims

Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance claimsIntroductory observationsClaims for knowing receipt (sometimes also known as ‘unconscionable receipt’) and for dishonest assistance are sometimes referred to as ‘accessory liability’ claims in that they involve pursuing a defendant who has been involved

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clauses

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clausesParties may often seek to specify that the entirety of their contractual relationship is governed by the written contract they have signed. This is what is known as an ‘entire agreement clause’. This Practice Note considers why they are used and some

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners

Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitionersThis Practice Note outlines some of the key considerations when dealing with claims concerning company directors. It addresses the definition of a director, the likely claimant(s) in actions involving directors as well