- No abuse of process in running same arguments in possession and sale hearing as run in earlier charging order proceedings (The Law Society v Dua)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: Court permits a husband to argue at the trial of a possession and sale claim that his wife had no beneficial interest in properties despite his wife having unsuccessfully argued the same point at a final charging order hearing. Written by Phillip Patterson, barrister, Hardwicke.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial