2023-24—Budget and Finance Bill

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Overview Content for select subtopic is not present

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Share Incentives News

Share Incentives weekly highlights—6 February 2025

This week's edition of Share Incentives weekly highlights includes: (1) the Takeover Panel’s new guidance on the cancellation of admission to trading for companies subject to the Takeover Code, (2) a report from WTW on the use of ESG targets in global executive incentive plans and (3) new Practice Note on CSOPs and corporate events.

Share Incentives weekly highlights—30 January 2025

This week's edition of Share Incentives weekly highlights includes: (1) PLSA’s publication of its Stewardship and Voting guidelines for 2025, (2) amendments tabled to the Finance Bill 2024–25 in relation to the tax treatment of EOTs, (3) announcement of a further independent review of the loan charge and (4) a new Q&A regarding whether an LLP can qualify as a ‘body corporate’ in order to be a constituent company under either a CSOP, SAYE scheme or SIP.

Share Incentives weekly highlights—23 January 2025

This week's edition of Share Incentives weekly highlights includes a focus on executive pay.

Share Incentives weekly highlights—16 January 2025

This week's edition of Share Incentives weekly highlights includes: (1) ISS Governance publishing its 2025 Proxy Voting Guidelines for the UK and Ireland, (2) a Q&A which looks at whether a SIP can be structured so that the trustees are not obliged to vote on behalf of participants and (3) a new Practice Note on CSOP valuations.

View Share Incentives by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of

Micklefield clauses

Micklefield clausesWhat is a Micklefield clause?It is common for employee share plans to provide that, on termination of employment (or when an employee is given or receives notice of termination of employment), subsisting share awards will be forfeited and subsisting share options will lapse.It is

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to
Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of

Micklefield clauses

Micklefield clauses

Micklefield clausesWhat is a Micklefield clause?It is common for employee share plans to provide that, on termination of employment (or when an employee is given or receives notice of termination of employment), subsisting share awards will be forfeited and subsisting share options will lapse.It is

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to