The doctrine of merger in judgment
Produced in partnership with Jack Mitchell of Old Square Chambers
Practice notesThe doctrine of merger in judgment
Produced in partnership with Jack Mitchell of Old Square Chambers
Practice notesWhat is merger in judgment and its relationship with Res judicata?
A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.
For further guidance, see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata.
Merger in judgment is a doctrine that treats a cause of action as extinguished once judgment has been given on it so that the claimant's sole right is a right on the judgment. It is a substantive rule about the legal effect of an English judgment, which is regarded as 'of a higher nature' so that the inferior remedy is merged in the higher and therefore supersedes the underlying cause of action (King v Hoare).
Autrefois acquit and autrefois convict enforce the doctrine of merger in judgment in the criminal law (Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 (at pp 256, 279) (not
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.