Home / Dispute Resolution / Claims and remedies / Cryptoassets for dispute resolution lawyers

Legal News

Crypto-Traders can't revive bulk of £10bn Binance claim

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 27 May 2025
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360, London: An appeals court on 21 May 2025 rejected most of a £10bn class action against Binance for delisting a bitcoin alternative, ruling that investors were not entitled to claim damages from the cryptocurrency exchange on the basis they lost out on its future speculative value.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

Loss of chance damages

Loss of chance damagesThis Practice Note considers in detail when damages for loss of a chance (loss of an opportunity damages) may be recoverable, with reference to the test in Allied Maples v Simmons & Simmons, its further consideration in Wellesley v Withers and the Supreme Court’s

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clauses

Contract interpretation—entire agreement clausesParties may often seek to specify that the entirety of their contractual relationship is governed by the written contract they have signed. This is what is known as an ‘entire agreement clause’. This Practice Note considers why they are used and some

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimThis Practice Note outlines the key elements for establishing a claim in negligence. For specific guidance on negligence in the context of company/parent company liability, banks and in professional negligence cases, see:•Practice Note: Tortious

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claims

Causation and remoteness in tort and negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the requirement for causation as part of establishing a viable claim in tort, including in negligence claims. It considers the aspects of factual causation: including the ‘but for’ test, evidencing it and its limits,