The following Dispute Resolution practice note Produced in partnership with Charles Spragge of Druces provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note sets out when and how an innocent party can rescind a contract for misrepresentation, why they would wish to do so and when rescission is not permissible.
For guidance on when a party may recover damages for a misrepresentation or seek to limit/exclude liability for misrepresentation, see Practice Notes:
Misrepresentation—damages as a remedy
Misrepresentations—excluding and limiting liability for them
A party who was induced to enter into a contract by a misrepresentation may elect to rescind the contract. If the rescission is challenged, that party may seek the assistance of the court to give effect to the rescission.
The effect of rescission, where available, is to put the parties back in the position they were in before the contract was made. It is sometimes referred to as rescission ab initio to distinguish it from termination or cancellation that does not nullify the contract, but brings it to an end.
Rescission is available as a remedy whether the misrepresentation was fraudulent, negligent or innocent, provided the statement made induced the representee to enter into the contract and it was false.
It is an equitable remedy granted in the court’s discretion. Importantly, the representee is not required to show that they suffered any loss.
Once the representee has become aware of the false statement that induced them to enter into the contract, they
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The key implications for civil appeals are set
An intention to create legal relations is requiredThere are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).Did the parties intend to
The procedure for making an application to stay proceedings due to abuse of process is governed by the Criminal Procedure Rules 2015 (CrimPR), SI 2015/1490, r 3.20. For more information, see Practice Note: Abuse of process procedure.Staying a prosecution for abuse of processThe principle of abuse of
This Practice Note considers the position of a security holder who has an equitable mortgage or charge over land and, in particular the powers that are available to complete a sale of the charged property.This Practice Note deals only with registered land.Mortgages and charges over land—a
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.