Table of contents
- Original news
- What were the key legal features of this case?
- What does this case tell us about the application of the principles of M v M?
- What lessons can be taken from the way in which the court approached the grounds for appeal?
Article summary
Family analysis: John Nicholson, partner, and Thomas Pavey, solicitor, in the family law team at Irwin Mitchell, explain that the judgment in SR v RS demonstrates that parties cannot, in the face of reasonable offers to settle, continue to litigate matters indefinitely without the spectre of cost sanctions.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial