Spousal/civil partner periodical payments

General principles

On an application for financial orders the court may order a party to a marriage or civil partnership to make periodical payments to the other party.

The court’s power to make a periodical payments order is contained in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004)—that is, an order that either party to the marriage or civil partnership shall make to the other such periodical payments, for such term, as may be specified in the order (commonly known as maintenance orders).

In determining whether or not a periodical payments order is appropriate regard must be had to the checklist set out in MCA 1973, s 25 and CPA 2004, Sch 5, Pt 5

See Practice Note: General principles—spousal/civil partner periodical payments. The following Precedent letters may be sent by practitioners to their clients: Financial applications to the court—client guide, Financial disclosure and Form E—client guide and Spousal and civil partner maintenance—client guide.

Quantum of periodical payments

No strict formula applies to the calculation of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Cafcass guidance on conflicting assessments in public law cases

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published new guidance for local authorities and Cafcass for cases where the views of the children’s guardian (and therefore their independent advice to the court) and the assessment of a local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer fundamentally differ on the final care plan or interim arrangements for a child. The guidance applies to all children in care and supervision order applications under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and deprivation of liberty applications. The guidance sets out the process that should be followed at any point during proceedings where a divergence arises and should be completed before final recommendations are submitted to court. The guidance requires that a pre-final hearing meeting be convened to identify and document the points of difference for the court. It includes suggestions for structuring the pre-final hearing meeting, a template agenda and a template for sharing the agreed rationale with the court. The guidance is not intended to be used to agree a joint position, rather to make sure that recommendations to court include a clear explanation about why the children’s guardian, the local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer have reached fundamentally different positions. The explanation must set out what the points of difference are so that the judge in the case can better understand these. It remains for the court to decide what is safe and in the best interests of the child.

View Family by content type :

Popular documents