Property adjustment orders

General principles

Section 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) defines the court’s powers to make a property adjustment order in favour of a party to the marriage or to (or for the benefit of) any child of the family on the making of an order/decree of divorce, nullity or judicial separation. There are corresponding provisions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). The order will not take effect until after the making of a final order/decree absolute (in divorce, nullity or dissolution) or the making of an order/decree of (judicial) separation. See Practice Note: Property adjustment orders—general principles including sections on: Orders that may be made by the court, Property adjustment orders for the benefit of children and Interim orders.

There is no definition of property in respect of which jurisdiction may be exercised. So long as the property is sufficiently identifiable to be specified in the order, it may be subject to a property adjustment order. The available types of property adjustment order include:

  1. a transfer of property

  2. a settlement of property

  3. a variation

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Cafcass guidance on conflicting assessments in public law cases

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published new guidance for local authorities and Cafcass for cases where the views of the children’s guardian (and therefore their independent advice to the court) and the assessment of a local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer fundamentally differ on the final care plan or interim arrangements for a child. The guidance applies to all children in care and supervision order applications under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and deprivation of liberty applications. The guidance sets out the process that should be followed at any point during proceedings where a divergence arises and should be completed before final recommendations are submitted to court. The guidance requires that a pre-final hearing meeting be convened to identify and document the points of difference for the court. It includes suggestions for structuring the pre-final hearing meeting, a template agenda and a template for sharing the agreed rationale with the court. The guidance is not intended to be used to agree a joint position, rather to make sure that recommendations to court include a clear explanation about why the children’s guardian, the local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer have reached fundamentally different positions. The explanation must set out what the points of difference are so that the judge in the case can better understand these. It remains for the court to decide what is safe and in the best interests of the child.

View Family by content type :

Popular documents