Preservation of assets

Securing assets

Where there are concerns that a party intends to dispose of assets in a way that will defeat a claim for financial provision, or has already done so, immediate action may need to be taken to secure the assets. There are various ways in which this may be done:

•
under section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) or the equivalent Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) provisions
•
by an application for an interim order under the provisions of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 20, or
•
under the inherent jurisdiction of the court

Such applications may be expensive and high risk. Consideration should be given to other available options and the value of the assets in question in the context of the overall value of the parties assets, ie whether the applicant's claim may be satisfied from other assets.

See Practice Notes: Interim orders under FPR 2010, Pt 20 and Procedure for an interim remedy under FPR 2010, Pt 20.

Where a respondent in family proceedings is

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family Procedure Rules 2010 Practice Direction Update No 3 of 2025

The third Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) Practice Direction (PD) update of 2025 has been issued, making amendments to two existing PDs, FPR 2010, PD 36Z (Pilot Scheme: Private Law Reform: Investigative Approach) together with FPR 2010, PD12B (Pilot: Private law reform: investigative approach), which is annexed to FPR 2010, PD 36Z. These existing PDs make provision for the Pathfinder pilot. Pathfinder is piloting, in selected courts, a new procedural approach to certain private law proceedings relating to children, in place of the Child Arrangements Programme. The PD amendments come into force on 14 August 2025.

Family weekly highlights—31 July 2025

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes details of the speeches by the Master of Rolls and Lord Justice Birss at a Civil Procedure Rule Committee and Online Procedure Rule Committee event, the coming into force of the Arbitration Act 2025 and the minutes from the latest Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting. Analysis of the need to undertake a holistic risk assessment when making final care orders is set out, together with consideration of how to accommodate an asylum seeking child. Recent judgments on declarations of parentage and the use of expert reports in financial remedy proceedings are also considered.

The buck stops here—local authority fails to avoid legal responsibilities to house 18-year old (R(AAM) v London Borough of Bromley)

Local Government analysis: This case concerned an application for judicial review for an asylum-seeking qualifying young person requesting accommodation from the local authority in circumstances where the local authority declined to accommodate him and instead directed him to asylum support accommodation. The claim was allowed. The court found that that the support powers of the Secretary of State for the Home Department under section 95 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 were residual and therefore the local authority was not entitled to look to the availability of such support when determining whether to support a young person under sections 24 and 24A of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989 ). Written by Silvia Nicolaou Garcia, associate at Bindmans LLP.

Event to mark the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee and to launch the work of the Online Procedure Rule Committee

On 16 July 2025, the Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Birss gave speeches at an event hosted by the Ministry of Justice and The Law Society. The event marked the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) and launched the public engagement work carried out by the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC).