Table of contents
- Original news
- What does this case tell us about the court’s approach to the use of its powers under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 31(7)(a) (MCA 1973)?
- What are the issues when considering the court’s power under MCA 1973, s 31(7B) around capitalisation?
- What lessons can lawyers take from this case in respect of the funds and rates of return?
- How might this decision affect future cases?
- What should lawyers do next?
Article summary
Family analysis: How will the courts approach the issue of rates of return to be applied to capital? Philip Perrins, of 1 Garden Court Chambers, says important lessons can be learnt from a recent decision, including whether, in light of prevailing market conditions and the particular facts of the case, consideration ought to be given to applying alternative rates of return on a capital fund.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial