Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Family analysis: Samara Brackley, barrister at Pump Court Chambers, examines the decision in G v T in which the single most important dispute between the parties revolved around the value to be ascribed to the husband’s interest in a limited company and whether there was any post-separation apportionment of that business that should be preserved for the husband.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial