powered by Lexis^®PSL

Home / Family / Financial provision / Factors considered by the court

Legal News

Family court’s approach to valuing shares in a private company (G v T)

Family court’s approach to valuing shares in a private company (G v T)

Published on: 17 July 2020

Published by: LexisPSL

Family court’s approach to valuing shares in a private company (G v T)
What are the practical implications of this case?
What was the background?
What did the court decide?

Article summary

Family analysis: Samara Brackley, barrister at Pump Court Chambers, examines the decision in G v T in which the single most important dispute between the parties revolved around the value to be ascribed to the husband’s interest in a limited company and whether there was any post-separation apportionment of that business that should be preserved for the husband. Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Contractual damages—pecuniary losses

This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual

LEXISNEXIS

Money Laundering Regulations 2017—simplified due diligence

You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:

LEXISNEXIS

Tomlin orders

Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border

LEXISNEXIS

The Single Rulebook

Background to the Single RulebookHistorically, the European Commission (Commission) favours using Directives (rather than Regulations) to set out its legislation in respect of the financial services sector. However, Directives, allowing Member States greater flexibility in how they implement