The following Dispute Resolution Q&A Produced in partnership with David Sawtell of 39 Essex Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The current owner of the motor car was not in a contract with the repairers, who carried out the work for the previous owner. As there is no privity of contract between the repairers and the current owner, a claim in contract relying on an implied term that the work would be carried out with reasonable care and skill (such as under section 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982) will most likely fail.
The current owner’s claim against the garage will therefore be limited to an action in negligence.
In order to establish negligence, the claimant will need to prove that the garage owed him a duty of care in respect of the loss caused. See Practice Note: Key elements to establish a claim in negligence.
If the claimant can show that the negligence has caused personal injury or damage to property other than the motor vehicle itself, the claimant is likely to be able to show that there was such a duty of care. In Haseldine v Daw & Son Ltd, at 379 Goddard LJ stated that 'a repairer of a chattel stands in no different position from that of a manufacturer, and does owe a duty to a person who, in the ordinary course, may be expected to make use of the thing repaired'.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Express and implied contractual terms distinguishedContractual terms may be either express or implied:•express terms—are terms which are actually recorded in a written contract or openly expressed in an oral contract at the time the contract is made (or there may be a combination of written and oral
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
The right to notice means a right for the employee to remain in employment for the period of notice, not simply to be paid for it. An employer will therefore often include in the contract an express right to make a payment in lieu of notice ('PILON') as an alternative to giving notice, to ensure
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.