Q&As

What are the implications of referring to either the gross or net value of the former matrimonial home in a consent order providing for the matrimonial home to be transferred to the wife subject to a charge in favour of the husband exercisable on the happening of certain trigger events under a Mesher order?

read titleRead full title
Produced in partnership with Chris Bryden of 4 King’s Bench Walk
Published on: 21 June 2017
imgtext

The simple reason for expressing a charge as a proportion of the gross is that it secures a sum of money (though a percentage means that the chargor is subject to the vicissitudes

Chris Bryden
Chris Bryden

Chris was called to the Bar in 2003 and since that time has built a busy practice across a range of areas, with an emphasis on Chancery practice. He enjoys a well-deserved reputation for his knowledge and expertise in each area. He appears regularly in the County Court, Family Court and the High Court as well as various specialist Tribunals, and has been involved in cases up to and including the Supreme Court. He regularly is instructed at Appellate level. He has extensive and wide-ranging experience particularly in the areas of wills, probate and inheritance disputes; property including adverse possession, boundary disputes and issues arising out of trusts of land; company and commercial work and financial remedies. Chris is head of the Family Group and head of the Property Team at 4KBW.

Chris is the author of numerous articles in publications such as the New Law Journal, Counsel and Family Law, amongst many other titles, and is the co-author of Social Media in the Workplace: A Handbook (2015, Jordan Publishing).

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Popular documents